Skip to main content

active directory - Forest trust on the same subnet to migrate users

Wondering if anyone could offer some advice on something.
I have a domain that desperately needs to be upgraded. Typically, one would add a new DC
with a reduced functional level to the domain, transfer roles, remove the old DC, raise
the functional level and be done with it but I am left in a situation where I cannot
adprep or forestprep the existing domain controller due to ages of mismanagement and
poor maintenance leaving broken/untouchable objects in AD. I have tried every fix I
could find even resorting to trying to make manual changes to the AD hive. Admittedly,
this is probably how my predecessor broke it in the first place
:/



My alternative option is now to create a
fresh, new domain as we have a small environment. What I would like to do is create a
trust between the old forest and new forest (2003 R2 and 2012 R2) and use ADMT to
migrate/copy users with their sIDHistory to the new domain in the new forest so everyone
can just keep their existing profiles.



The
problem I can't seem to climb over is how to establish the trust between the two forests
without having separate networks. The new DC can see the other forest to trust it but
the old DC cannot see the new forest to reciprocate the trust relationship. This might
be obvious to someone accustomed to managing corporate mergers as opposed to only
managing existing infrastructure. I have a feeling this has to do with advertised
services/DNS but I'm probably not correct and find myself on a tangent chasing loosely
related solutions.




I have also played
with the idea of converting everyone's domain profiles to local profiles, joining them
to the new domain and then converting their profiles back to domain profiles. Would this
in effect present the same requirement of the user accounts on the new domain needing
the sIDHistory?



Thank you in advance for any
advice.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able