Skip to main content

Sharing two SSL certificates with as wildcard and root domains in nginx (same server)

itemprop="text">


I have purchased a wildcard
certificate and a single certificate for my domain structure which
is:



app.example.com =>
single
*.app.example.com =>
wildcard


Both these
routes should point to the same project directory on same
server



Note: RapidSSL Support said
that I had to purchase two as unlike classic domains example.com, my one is
app.example.com, so that wildcard won't care my 3 decimal
root




Now, I need to setup
in nginx two different certificates. My default one (which works for my wildcard),
however not 'app.example.com' as its ssl certificate is not
included.



server {

listen 443 ssl default_server;
listen [::]:443 ssl
default_server;

ssl on;
ssl_certificate
/etc/ssl/ssl_certificate.cer; // this is my wildcard cert
ssl_certificate_key
/etc/ssl/private.key;



root
/var/www/example/public;
index index.php index.html
index.htm;

server_name .app.example.com;


location / {
try_files $uri $uri/ /index.php?$query_string;

}


location ~ \.php$ {
try_files $uri
=404;
fastcgi_split_path_info ^(.+\.php)(/.+)$;
fastcgi_pass
unix:/var/run/php/php7.0-fpm.sock;
fastcgi_index index.php;

fastcgi_param SCRIPT_FILENAME $document_root$fastcgi_script_name;
include
fastcgi_params;
}
}


// And for
redirect:
server {
listen 80 default_server;
listen
[::]:80 default_server;

server_name .app.example.com;

return 301
https://$server_name$request_uri;
}



How
can I divide this into two and include my new certificate for app.example.com and keep
wildcard as this?


itemprop="text">
class="normal">Answer



Use two
server blocks, one for the single domain and one for the
wildcard domain. Specify the appropriate server_name and
ssl_certificate
directives.



server {

listen 443 ssl;
listen [::]:443 ssl;

server_name
*.app.example.com;

ssl_certificate
/etc/ssl/ssl_certificate1.cer;
ssl_certificate_key
/etc/ssl/private1.key;

...
}
server
{
listen 443 ssl;
listen [::]:443 ssl;


server_name app.example.com;

ssl_certificate
/etc/ssl/ssl_certificate2.cer;
ssl_certificate_key
/etc/ssl/private2.key;


...
}


See
this document for
details.



You can use an
include directive to pull common configuration into each block
from some other file.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able