Skip to main content

raid - What will happen if encountered a URE?



About hdd URE, I knew these points:





  1. For some reasons, when harddisk reading a sector that the FEC(Foward Error Correction data) could not correct the errors on that sector, we encontered an URE.

  2. The rating we encountered an URE is very low, but still exists.

  3. When reconstructing a RAID 5 array, sometimes it will happened and the reconstruction progress will stop.



But I still have some questions:




  1. If there is a single disk, what will happened? Hardware/file system report an error and we lost a file? Or we got the file with wrong data?


  2. Will rewrite some data to that URE sector could turn the sector become normal? Or must we use some utilities provieded by HDD manufactory and remap another reserve sector?

  3. If it happened when we mirror/re-mirror a RAID 1/10 array, what will the RAID controller do? Stop the mirror progress? Or just copy the uncorrect data to another disk?






Thanks for the answer, question 1&2 is solved.



But the 3rd question I mean if encountered URE when converting a single HDD to RAID 1 array by add another new disk, or replacing a failure disk in a RAID 1/10 array, there's no redundancy to correct the error. Will it complete the mirror/re-mirror progress with error data? OR stop the progress like RAID 5 recontruction?


Answer





  1. With a single disk, an unrecoverable error is just that - it can't be done and it is reported to the filesystem and subsequently to the application trying to read a file. Generally, it is preferred to get an explicit error instead of unreliable data.

  2. Writing to an unreadable sector will either fix the physical sector (for a soft error when e.g. writing was interrupted by power loss) or the drive will map the logical sector to one of its spare pool. This happens at the discretion of the drive and isn't usually user/driver selectable.

  3. The RAID controller will most likely repair the sector - either from the mirror or by rebuilding the data from the redundancy set. When during a mirror or rebuild a(nother) read error prevents this repair, the error sticks and the array is bad. Some RAID sets can repair multiple errors (RAID 6 or some nested RAIDs) but once errors pile up you're out of luck.



It's important to make sure errors don't pile up on rarely used sectors - they can become uncorrectable errors when sectors are left unread for months or even years. So, make sure you enable data scrubbing, media patrol, patrol read or whatever it's called on your hardware to check all data on a regular basis. That way, you ensure a rebuild works when you need it.



Some people report that during a rebuild, additional drives start to fail because of the stress but I've found this to be a myth. The drives just stumble on stale, accumulated errors. You can stress even very old drives for days without any problems.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able