Skip to main content

Is this round-about migration to SBS2011 from 2008 feasible?

itemprop="text">

I run my own consulting software shop,
and I'm currently running SBS 2008 Premium. I'm not utilizing the second server at the
moment, but when I finally get to SBS 2011 Premium I'd like to. The server is already
maxed at 4GB of ram, and I have six drives, one for the C: and the rest are part of a
RAID 5 which is where all user data is stored (Sql dbs, Exchange data, file
shares).




I'd like to get some new
hardware that will eventually run SBS 2011.



My
plan is to get the new hardware which will include disks for a RAID 5 and hardware
virtualization support. I'll then install the second Windows 2008 Server license that
comes with SBS 2008. I'd like to then move the current SBS server from physical hardware
to a virtual on the new secondary server. This is one area I'm not sure of. Is it
possible, and also what about the data on the RAID disks? Will that pose a
problem?



Later when I have enough to buy the
SBS2011, I'd upgrade the secondary 2008 server (running on the new physical hardware),
then setup SBS2011 in a new virtual and migrate from 2008 to
2011.



Would this be a possible route to go? If
not, what would be the best recommendation, given that there will be a delay between
buying the new server hardware and buying the SBS2011
license.



EDIT: I'm planning on using the second
server (not in use at all right now) to install 2008 HyperV on the new hardware, then
pull the physical SBS into a virtual on the new hardware. I've never done a P2V before,
so I'm not sure what to do about the data drive which is currently a RAID5 and where
SBS2008 stores its Exchange data and user folder redirections.



Answer





There is a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg490796.aspx" rel="nofollow
noreferrer">migration guide for SBS 2011 which lists the supported
migration path from 2008 to 2011. Basically, href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg616008.aspx" rel="nofollow
noreferrer">the only supported upgrade option is a fresh install of the SBS
2011 on new hardware in what is called "Upgrade Mode" (it will allow the SBS 2011 server
to join the presently available SBS 2008 domain and pull all Active Directory data) and
the wizard-assisted or manual migration of all data and server software from the old to
the new server.



There is
no in-place upgrade option for the SBS from any previously
installed OS, you always have to deal with a fresh
install.



If you virtualize, this will be not too
much of a concern - you simply fire up a new virtual machine for your SBS 2011
installation. Make sure to get enough RAM for your physical machine - SBS 2011 is quite
memory-hungry, expect a single instance to easily eat 16 GB of
RAM.




I'd like to
then move the current SBS server from physical hardware to a virtual on the new
secondary server. This is one area I'm not sure of. Is it possible, and also what about
the data on the RAID
disks?





The
name for this procedure is "physical-to-virtual" (P2V) conversion.
You would have a different set of tools depending on the virtualization platform you are
going to chose to accomplish this task. For VMWare virtualizaion products (vSphere
ESXi), the VMWare converter is free and really easy to use, you will find a lot of href="http://www.vi-tips.com/2011/11/p2v-with-vmware-converter-standalone-5.html"
rel="nofollow noreferrer">walkthroughs and howtos on the net.



The converter tool will make it easy for you to
copy the data off the old machine into the virtualized environment, the RAID volume
content can be copied as any other volume's content. Typically, you are getting the
choice to resize your partitions and filesystems as part of the conversion
process.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?
Post a Comment
Read more

ubuntu - Monitoring CPU, Mem, disk, on a single server

I've been looking for a simple starter solution for monitoring my [currently] single server hosted solution. Other than Nagios and similar, are there other good (simple) solutions people are using? Answer Everything depends on what you want. For example Munin is very simple, you can install and configure it in less then 10 minutes (on one server), it can sends alarms, make graphs from monitoring cpu, mem. apache connections, eaccellerator, disk io and many many more (it has many plugins). But if you are planning in future get some more machines, munin may not be enough. For example in munin you cant monitor state of individual processes, can't monitor changes in files (for security purpose). So if you wanna only see what is the utilization of basics parameters on your server and don't plan to buy some more servers Munin is what you are looking for, but if you wanna be alarmed when some of your service is down, take more control on what is happeninig on...
Post a Comment
Read more

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits, ...
Post a Comment
Read more