Skip to main content

linux - Correct way to set up DNS primary/secondary/... for redundancy and latency reduction?

I thought DNS primary/secondary for redundancy purposes
was straightforward. My understanding is that you should have a primary and at least one
secondary, and that you should set up your secondary in a geographically different
location, but also behind a different router (see for example href="https://serverfault.com/questions/48087/why-are-there-several-nameservers-for-my-domain"
title="this
question">https://serverfault.com/questions/48087/why-are-there-several-nameservers-for-my-domain)



Currently,
we have two name servers both in our main data center. Recently, we've suffered some
outages for various reasons that took out both name servers, and left us and our
customers without working DNS for a few hours. I've asked my sysadmin team to finish
setting up a DNS server in another data center and configure it as the secondary name
server.



However, our sysadmins claim that this
doesn't help much if the other data center is not at least as dependable as the primary
data center. They claim that most clients will still fail to look up properly, or time
out too long, when the primary data center is
down.



Personally, I'm convinced we're not the
only company with this kind of problem and that it most likely is already a solved
problem. I can't imagine all those internet companies being affected by our kind of
problem. However, I can't find good online docs that explain what happens in failure
cases (for example, client timeouts) and how to work around
them.



What arguments can I use to poke holes in
our sysadmins' reasoning ? Any online resources I can consult to better understand the
problems they claim exist ?




Some
additional notes after reading the
replies:




  • we're on
    Linux

  • we have additional complicated DNS needs; our DNS
    entries are managed by some custom software, with BIND currently slaving from a Twisted
    DNS implementation, and some views in the mix as well. However we're completely capable
    of setting up our own DNS servers at another data
    center.

  • I'm talking about authoritative DNS for outsiders
    to find our servers, not recursive DNS servers for our local clients.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits, ...

linux - Awstats - outputting stats for merged Access_logs only producing stats for one server's log

I've been attempting this for two weeks and I've accessed countless number of sites on this issue and it seems there is something I'm not getting here and I'm at a lost. I manged to figure out how to merge logs from two servers together. (Taking care to only merge the matching domains together) The logs from the first server span from 15 Dec 2012 to 8 April 2014 The logs from the second server span from 2 Mar 2014 to 9 April 2014 I was able to successfully merge them using the logresolvemerge.pl script simply enermerating each log and > out_putting_it_to_file Looking at the two logs from each server the format seems exactly the same. The problem I'm having is producing the stats page for the logs. The command I've boiled it down to is /usr/share/awstats/tools/awstats_buildstaticpages.pl -configdir=/home/User/Documents/conf/ -config=example.com awstatsprog=/usr/share/awstats/wwwroot/cgi-bin/awstats.pl dir=/home/User/Documents/parced -month=all -year=all...