Skip to main content

hardware - RAID Array performance on an HP Proliant ML350 G5 Smart Array E200i

itemprop="text">

We have a client who is complaining
about performance of an application which utilizes an MS SQL database. They do not
believe the performance issues are the fault of the application
itself.



The Smart Array E200i RAID controller
has 128MB cache and we have the cache set to 75% read/25% write. The disk array set to
enable write caching.



Recently we ran a disk
performance test using href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=9a8b005b-84e4-4f24-8d65-cb53442d9e19&displaylang=en"
rel="nofollow noreferrer">SQLIO based on href="http://sqlserverpedia.com/wiki/SAN_Performance_Tuning_with_SQLIO" rel="nofollow
noreferrer">this guide. We used a 10 GB file for the test found that the
average sequential read rate was ~60 MB/sec (megabytes/sec) and the average random read
rate was ~30 MB/sec. Are these numbers on par for what the server should be performing?
Better than on par? Horrible?
Amazing?



Additional information on the server
set up/RAID controller config:
There are three, 146 GB SAS 10k RPM 3.0 GB/sec
(model HP DG146BABCF) drives, configured in a RAID 5 array. These are the only physical
disks available to the server so both logs and data, including operating system data and
paging file are all on the same physical disk array (there are 2 logical drives with the
OS data being separate). The array stripe size is set to 64k. Total usable space is 273
GB.




The HP Advanced Data Guard is
turned off. Rebuild and expand priority are set to medium. Surface scan delay is 15 sec.
The controller has a cache board and a battery pack.



Answer




Too many imponderables. For example, how are the disks set up? If the logs and
data share the same disks the random I/O from the data areas will disrupt the log
traffic, which is mostly sequential I/O and is disproportionately affected by a busy
random access workload on the same
disks.



Without some more insight into your
configuration I can't really say what might be causing the problem.



For example, 60MB/sec off a RAID is about right
for a 4-disk RAID-5 or RAID-10 with 64k stripes and 15k drives. Each drive will read one
64k stripe per revolution of the disk (about 250/sec for a 15k drive) which gives you
15MB/sec per drive.



The average seek time for a
15k disk is around 3ms across the whole disk. On a mostly contiguous 10GB file on a RAID
volume with (say) 146GB or 300GB disks and a bit of help from the cache I could see
30MB/sec being a reasonable figure for a disk array configured as described above. It
would indicate averaging a data read about every two revolutions of the
disks.




That's a thought off the top
of my head for a configuration one might reasonably expect to see on an ML350. However,
I have no idea if that matches your actual configuration, so I can't really comment on
whether the observations are relevant in your case.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?
Post a Comment
Read more

ubuntu - Monitoring CPU, Mem, disk, on a single server

I've been looking for a simple starter solution for monitoring my [currently] single server hosted solution. Other than Nagios and similar, are there other good (simple) solutions people are using? Answer Everything depends on what you want. For example Munin is very simple, you can install and configure it in less then 10 minutes (on one server), it can sends alarms, make graphs from monitoring cpu, mem. apache connections, eaccellerator, disk io and many many more (it has many plugins). But if you are planning in future get some more machines, munin may not be enough. For example in munin you cant monitor state of individual processes, can't monitor changes in files (for security purpose). So if you wanna only see what is the utilization of basics parameters on your server and don't plan to buy some more servers Munin is what you are looking for, but if you wanna be alarmed when some of your service is down, take more control on what is happeninig on...
Post a Comment
Read more

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits, ...
Post a Comment
Read more