Skip to main content

windows server 2008 - Adding virtual NIC to HyperV VMs killed my network speed

I have a pretty simple configuration: Windows Server 2012 Hyper V Host, with two VMs (both Server 2012), one for IIS, one for SQL Server. They're all connecting through the physical NIC



Last night I tried adding a virtual switch, and setting up virtual NICs on the two VMs (in addition to the physical NIC).



I hadn't switched over the servers to actually use the virtual NICs yet, but for some reason, this destroyed the connection speed between the two VMs -- even though the virtual NICs weren't being used. We're talking from 200-500 milliseconds to 30-90 seconds per request!



So this morning, after seeing the terrible impact it had on my site, I disabled the two virtual NICs, since that's all that I changed, and sure enough, speeds came back.



Ultimately I need to get them switched over to using the v-NICs, but I need to get past this issue first.




What could be causing this? And what can I do to troubleshoot it?



Additional details:



The setup is actually very simple (which may be part of my problem, I may be oversimplifying what is needed to get this set up).



I have a single server with a single (physical) NIC. Currently, this NIC is used for communication between the v-host and the internet, as well as between the two VMs and the internet. It is also used for intra-communication between the two VMs.



However, I'm trying to switch the intra-communication to go through the virtual swtich via vNICs, freeing up the physical NIC to be used only for external communication.




So I added an internal virtual switch to the v-host, then added a virtual NIC to each VM.



After doing this, that's when my connection speeds -- over the physical NIC -- dropped drastically. Disabling the vNICs (through the VMs' network configuration) restored the speed back to normal.



Below are screens of the VM configuration for the external physical NIC and internal vNICs (on just one VM, as they're both identically configured).



Another round of details



In digging a bit more on the issue, it appears that Broadcom NICs are notorious for performance issues. This server has dual Broadcom BCM5716C NICs. Here are some links to discussion of known issues:




Slow Network Access Within Virtual Machines - Broadcom and Hyper-V



Hyper-V Virtual Machine Very Slow Network – VMQ – Broadcom



So I started playing with settings, disabling various settings, one at a time. None of the changes seemed to have any impact on the issue -- if I enable the guest vNIC, the load speeds drop to 25+ seconds. Disable it again, they return to 250ms -- a factor of 100!



I also tried installing the latest drivers from Broadcom, no difference.



At this point, I feel it's an issue of compatibility between the Broadcom NIC and Hyper-V. But I don't want to order new NICs and go through the trouble of shutting the site down, installing and configuring them, only for the problem to persist.




So it would be nice if I could definitively rule in or out the NIC.



Physical NIC configuration on the switch manager
Physical NIC configuration on the switch manager



Virtual switch configuration on the switch manager
Virtual switch configuration on the switch manager



Physical NIC configuration on the DB VM
Physical NIC configuration on the DB VM




Virtual NIC configuration on the DB VM
Virtual NIC configuration on the DB VM

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

iLO 3 Firmware Update (HP Proliant DL380 G7)

The iLO web interface allows me to upload a .bin file ( Obtain the firmware image (.bin) file from the Online ROM Flash Component for HP Integrated Lights-Out. ) The iLO web interface redirects me to a page in the HP support website ( http://www.hp.com/go/iLO ) where I am supposed to find this .bin firmware, but no luck for me. The support website is a mess and very slow, badly categorized and generally unusable. Where can I find this .bin file? The only related link I am able to find asks me about my server operating system (what does this have to do with the iLO?!) and lets me download an .iso with no .bin file And also a related question: what is the latest iLO 3 version? (for Proliant DL380 G7, not sure if the iLO is tied to the server model)

linux - Awstats - outputting stats for merged Access_logs only producing stats for one server's log

I've been attempting this for two weeks and I've accessed countless number of sites on this issue and it seems there is something I'm not getting here and I'm at a lost. I manged to figure out how to merge logs from two servers together. (Taking care to only merge the matching domains together) The logs from the first server span from 15 Dec 2012 to 8 April 2014 The logs from the second server span from 2 Mar 2014 to 9 April 2014 I was able to successfully merge them using the logresolvemerge.pl script simply enermerating each log and > out_putting_it_to_file Looking at the two logs from each server the format seems exactly the same. The problem I'm having is producing the stats page for the logs. The command I've boiled it down to is /usr/share/awstats/tools/awstats_buildstaticpages.pl -configdir=/home/User/Documents/conf/ -config=example.com awstatsprog=/usr/share/awstats/wwwroot/cgi-bin/awstats.pl dir=/home/User/Documents/parced -month=all -year=all...

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits, ...