Skip to main content

hp - PostgreSQL server: 10k RPM SAS or Intel 520 Series SSD drives?

itemprop="text">

We will be expanding the storage for a
PostgreSQL server and one of the things we are considering is using SSDs (Intel 520
Series) instead of rotating discs (10k RPM). Price per GB is comparable and we expect
improved performance, however we are concerned about longevity since our database usage
pattern is quite write-heavy. We are also concerned about data corruption in case of
power failure (due to SSDs write cache not flushing
properly).




We currently use RAID10
with 4 active HDDs (10k 146GB) and 1 spare configured in the controller. It's a HP DL380
G6 server with P410 Smart Array Controller and
BBWC.



What makes more sense: upgrading the
drives to 300GB 10k RPM or using Intel 520 Series SSDs (240GB)?



Answer




If you're using a server equipped with a Smart Array P400 controller, you're
dealing with a G5-era 300-series ProLiant (DL360 G5, DL380 G5, etc.) or a G4/G5-era
500-series ProLiant (DL580, ML570). All of those systems were eclipsed in 2009 or
before, so your system is several revisions behind and you're leaving performance on the
table...



That said, you can use the Intel SSD's
on your P400 controller. Understand that the P400 is only a 3Gb/s SAS
controller.



Upgrade the controller
firmware first.




They will
provide some advantage on writes. Adjust your RAID controller's cache ratio to 75:25
write:read. href="https://serverfault.com/questions/401488/non-volatile-cache-raid-controllers-what-kind-of-protection-is-there-against-nv">By
having a battery-backed unit (BBWC), the lack of a supercapacitor on your
Intel 520 SSD is not an issue. (you'd have the same concern with spinning disks and no
BBWC, right?)



Since storage space is your goal,
you could also add four more 146GB disks and expand your existing
array. There's a benefit there if you have the drive bays to support.



Either way, you have several options.



Edit:



Notes
on SSD's and P410 controllers:




href="https://serverfault.com/questions/401026/what-raid-controller-comes-with-dl360-g7/401030#401030">What
RAID controller comes with DL360
G7?



href="https://serverfault.com/questions/431437/hp-p410-raid-samsung-830-ssds-debian-6-0-what-performance-to-expect/431456#431456">HP
P410 RAID + Samsung 830 SSDs + Debian 6.0 - What performance to
expect?


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?
Post a Comment
Read more

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,
Post a Comment
Read more

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able
Post a Comment
Read more