Skip to main content

ubuntu - SSL connection refused

itemprop="text">

I'm getting "Connection refused"
errors for some sites being served over SSL on my Ubuntu box (10.04 LTS). It doesn't
affect all sites: https://github.com/, for example, loads no problem, but href="https://codeeval.com" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://codeeval.com
does not.



I've checked my firewall settings, and
there are no rules affecting connection to sites over port 443. But running nmap yields
the following:




$ nmap
-sT -r -n -p443 codeeval.com

Starting Nmap 5.00 ( http://nmap.org )
at 2011-06-22 11:25 BST
Interesting ports on 184.72.48.116:
PORT
STATE SERVICE
443/tcp closed https

Nmap done: 1 IP
address (1 host up) scanned in 1.31
seconds



To
check that it wasn't a problem with the site, I SSH'd into another computer on my local
network and ran the same command, this time
getting:



$ nmap -sT -r -n -p443
codeeval.com

Starting Nmap 5.00 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2011-06-22
11:37 BST
Interesting ports on 184.72.48.116:
PORT STATE
SERVICE
443/tcp open https

Nmap done: 1 IP address (1
host up) scanned in 0.53
seconds



There's
clearly something wrong with my local config, but I can't work out what might be causing
it. I haven't been able to track down any meaningful log messages; the only response
when I try to connect is "Connection
refused."



Does anyone have any insight into what
might be causing this?


itemprop="text">
class="normal">Answer



Actually,
I've found the solution. I followed the advice here - href="https://serverfault.com/questions/124831/ssh-connection-refused">SSH Connection
refused - which I assumed to be an unrelated
problem.



Clearing the IP tables and resetting
the rules fixed my
problem.




EDIT - A
follow up:



I've also determined
what caused the problem, though I'm now looking for a long-term solution. It would seem
that the changes made to my IP tables made by software called IPBlock persist even after
the application process has ended. The only way I can seem to prevent this is by
flushing the tables after I quit IPBlock. Does anyone have any better
suggestions?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able