linux - Samba 4.2 Shadow Copies in Windows 10

linux - Samba 4.2 Shadow Copies in Windows 10 - empty list

I have a Debian 8 system with Samba 4.2. I'm using ZFS file system for data storage. Windows sharing is working fine, except Windows clients can't see any Shadow Copies snapshots.

My samba config is:

[Test]
comment = test
writable = yes
directory mask = 0777
guest ok = Yes
path = /samba/123
create mask = 0666
read only = No
vfs objects = shadow_copy2

shadow: format = auto-%Y-%m-%d_%H.%M.%S--28d
shadow: sort = desc
shadow: snapdir = .zfs/snapshot

My snapshot list is:

zfs list -t snapshot

NAME                                     USED  AVAIL  REFER  MOUNTPOINT
tank/samba/123@GMT-2017.01.06-16.00.00    64K      -    96K  -
tank/samba/123@GMT-2017.01.07-10.00.00    64K      -    96K  -
tank/samba/123@GMT_2017.02.07-14.00.32    64K      -   120K  -
tank/samba/123@GMT_2017.02.07-07.02.04    64K      -   120K  -

I can actually cd into .zfs/snapshot and see these snapshots.

I'm trying to check any errors in log:
journalctl -u smbd -f does not see any errors/warning even with debug level = 10.
I even checked client-server communications with Wireshark, and it seems to be OK also:

SMB2    178 Ioctl Request FSCTL_GET_SHADOW_COPY_DATA File: test1.txt
SMB2    186 Ioctl Response FSCTL_GET_SHADOW_COPY_DATA File: test1.txt SUCCESS

What else can I do? Thank you in advance.

Answer

I can't test it to be sure, however I think you shouldn't add the expiration duration (--28) to the shadow format. Oh, and obviously your format is wrong, you're mixing up the separators, they don't match those you're using for your snapshots. Set it up this way:

   shadow: format = auto-%Y.%m.%d-%H.%M.%S

Comments

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able

Blog

Search This Blog