Skip to main content

apache 2.2 - Managing websites with Git under Ubuntu

itemprop="text">

So we've just received our new server
which will be used solely for website development and version
control.



I've set up Ubuntu (11.04 desktop
edition, I like interfaces, sorry!) and installed Apache, PHP and
MySQL - so far, so good.



We've decided that we
want to use Git as our version managing system, since we've had good experiences with
it. But... We're unsure of how to lay out, our structure. So I'm hoping you can help
us.



Current
setup




At the moment, we run one
development server bbtsrv02 which is a Windows server, running
XAMPP. We do all of our developments on this server and it leads to a lot of noise and
mess when we're hacking things quickly.



Once the
changes have been made locally, we upload these files to our external server (hosted by
someone else) via FTP.



/>

It's far from practical, there can be 3/5 developers
at one time working on the site as a whole. It causes conflicts and... it's not
nice.



The current
idea




The idea is to use
bbtsrv02 as a "mirror" server. It'll contain all of the most up
to date and live code. bbtsrv03 (the new server) will be our
development server. We'll have the master branch which will
also contain the live code, and each developer will branch their own version for each
change.



But... Further thinking has led me to
come to the conclusion, that we'll need to setup some virtual hosts, for each developer
so they can close the master repo and work from
there?



I don't have much experience in this
area, but my current plan is to partition the main HDD and give us each enough space to
develop on.



We then push our changes from our
branch to the master one and then "copy" it into bbtsrv02 and
upload. I'm hoping of course, I can make some bash scripts to do that for
me?



Answer




The way that we do it (YMMV) is as
follows:




Each dev builds and does
basic code tests on their desktop/laptop etc. They use git locally to commit changes,
branch etc. When they are ready to push, they take what ever local actions the need to
clean up their timeline and then they push.



The
push goes to a staging server. Our staging server is a mirror of our production servers.
We do load testing, code reviews, and final checks
there.



Once we pass that level, we push to the
production servers.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?
Post a Comment
Read more

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,
Post a Comment
Read more

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able
Post a Comment
Read more