Skip to main content

apache 2.2 - iPhone OS 11_3 http connection flood



I have been trying to limit max TCP connections to port 80 of my server coming from the same IP. I have used iptables for this task:



-A INPUT -p tcp --dport 80 -m conntrack --ctstate ESTABLISHED -m connlimit --connlimit-above 24 --connlimit-mask 32 -j LOG_THROT



The rule sends packets to my LOG_THROT chain where I log them and tcp reset the connection.



The problem is that all the IP's that get logged (overflooding 24 parallel http connection rule) and get found in apache's access logs seem legit users with referrals from google, coming from standard mobile ISP's like vodafone etc. What they all got in common is User agent and it is:




Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 11_3 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/
11.0 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1





I was wondering if the new OS/Browser has a higher limit than standard 6 parallel conns, does it maybe use some kind of preloading of the links found on the website and spawns additional connections or is it a crawler of some sort spoofing the UA?



If it is legit, what do you suggest for a safe connection count limit? 50, 100?


Answer



Why don't you tune your web and use HTTP/2 (eventual HTTPS)



They both use single, multiplexed connection, instead of multiple connections in HTTP1.x Domain sharding techniques are not needed any more.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

ubuntu - Monitoring CPU, Mem, disk, on a single server

I've been looking for a simple starter solution for monitoring my [currently] single server hosted solution. Other than Nagios and similar, are there other good (simple) solutions people are using? Answer Everything depends on what you want. For example Munin is very simple, you can install and configure it in less then 10 minutes (on one server), it can sends alarms, make graphs from monitoring cpu, mem. apache connections, eaccellerator, disk io and many many more (it has many plugins). But if you are planning in future get some more machines, munin may not be enough. For example in munin you cant monitor state of individual processes, can't monitor changes in files (for security purpose). So if you wanna only see what is the utilization of basics parameters on your server and don't plan to buy some more servers Munin is what you are looking for, but if you wanna be alarmed when some of your service is down, take more control on what is happeninig on...

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits, ...