Skip to main content

apt - debian wheezy, heartbleed, openssl refuses to update



I am having a strange problem, my system is exposed to heartbleed, and I am trying to fix it by using:
apt-get clean,
apt-get update
and
apt-get upgrade openssl




but the response is:




Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
openssl is already the newest version.
The following packages have been kept back:
libncurses5 libncursesw5 libssl-dev

0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3 not upgraded.


my openssl version is:
openssl version -a




OpenSSL 1.0.1f-dev xx XXX xxxx
built on: Mon Dec 23 14:23:57 UTC 2013
platform: debian-amd64
options: bn(64,64) rc4(8x,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) blowfish(idx)

compiler: gcc -fPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -m64 -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wl,-z,relro -Wa,--noexecstack -Wall -DMD32_REG_T=int -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAES_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DBSAES_ASM -DWHIRLPOOL_ASM -DGHASH_ASM
OPENSSLDIR: "/usr/lib/ssl"


openssl version -b




built on: Mon Dec 23 14:23:57 UTC 2013



I had thought that the problem is in the sources list and here is my sources list:




#deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian stable main contrib

#deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ wheezy-updates main contrib

#deb http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main contrib
deb http://http.debian.net/debian wheezy main
deb-src http://http.debian.net/debian wheezy main


deb http://http.debian.net/debian wheezy-updates main
deb-src http://http.debian.net/debian wheezy-updates main

deb http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main


you can see the old ones in comment, but updating and trying to upgrade even with apt-get upgrade make no progress.




My serevr is on rackspace if it's somehow relevant...



I really don't know what to do, please help me.


Answer



Thanks all for your efforts, here is how I had solved it:
apparently my openssl was from a test package instead of stable one. so the aptitude always thought the package is up to date.



in order to fix it I had run the next commands:
apt-get install openssl=1.0.1a-2+deb7u7
apt-get install libssl1.0.0=1.0.1e-2+deb7u7



it forced debian to install this packages with the exact version.
and now it works



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able