Skip to main content

performance - Best MySQL cache settings for 8gb RAM dedicated MySQL server using only InnoDB (5gb database)



I'm a pretty big noob when it comes to setting up MySQL for performance. And honestly I'm not worried about the fine tuning to squeeze every last bit of performance out of MySQL, but I do know that the most important thing to do that provides some of the best results is setting up caches/buffers correctly.




I've tried to keep things simple by using only InnoDB as a storage engine. And I do have a dedicated server for MySQL. It has 8gb of RAM, how should I be allocating that to maximize performance? I'd like to be able to fit my entire database into memory for the best performance. The database is about 5gb. Is this possible?



How much memory should I allocate to the query cache? How much to the InnoDB buffer pool? How much for the rest of the computer (i.e. non MySQL related processes)? Etc.



Since I'm not using MyISAM I don't really need to put a lot of memory in the key cache correct?


Answer



This is hard without knowing much about the database itself. There are a few tools you should be aware of;






About storing the entire database in memory; Any queries that are doing changes on the database will remain open until the write is performed on the disk. The only thing that can avoid the disk to be a bottleneck, is a disk-controller with a write cache.



I would start with the following changes from the defaults:



key_buffer_size = 128M
thread_stack = 128K
thread_cache_size = 8
table_cache = 8192
max_heap_table_size = 256M

query_cache_limit = 4M
query_cache_size = 512M

innodb_buffer_pool_size = 4G

# This is crucial to avoid checkpointing all the time:
innodb_log_file_size = 512M

# If you have control on who consumes the DB, and you don't use hostnames when you've set up permissions - this can help as well.
skip_name_resolve



Then I'd see how things go, and try different things based on (among other things) the output of the tools mentioned above. I would also make sure to graph trends with a monitoring tool, such as Munin or Cacti, to see what kind of workload I'm actually dealing with. Personally, I have great experience with the MySQL-plugins provided with Munin.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able