Skip to main content

networking - Datacenter ISP wants to assign an IP range to an existing ip address that we already use

itemprop="text">

I have a question about the setup of
our data center regarding a new IP
range.




The situation is as
follows.



we own/use a range x.x.x.x/28 we got it
already from our data center.
we have 16 addresses we already use for our
servers (13 actually without network, broadcast and default
gateway)



Now we want to order another range
y.y.y.y/27 that has 32-3 usable addresses I
presume.



Because they cannot assign this range
to the same network port where x.x.x.x/28 is assigned to, they ask me for an ip address
within the x.x.x.x/28 range, let's say a.a.a.a. to route the new range (y.y.y.y/27)
to.



The other solution is to hire a new network
port to which the y.y.y.y/27 range can be routed through
normally.




My account manager is a bit
vague and we can't afford to switch data center right
now.



So my question
is;



how do I configure this?
does
a.a.a.a become the default gateway somehow? I can't get a clear apprehension of how this
technically should work. Is there a special name for this type of routing? Google
doesn't give me any clear answers, because I don't know exactly what I'm looking
for.



I hope someone can shine a light for me on
this
one.




Thx



Bram



Answer




Your server which has a.a.a.a address assigned will
receive traffic addressed to network y.y.y.y/27. You can assign
addresses from the y.y.y.y/27 range as an IP aliases on the
same network interface as a.a.a.a by using ip addr
add y.y.y.y dev eth0
or you can route them to other servers by using
ip route add y.y.y.y via a.a.a.x
(a.a.a.x is a different server from range
x.x.x.x/28)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able