Skip to main content

Bandwidth with SAS expanders and RAID controllers

itemprop="text">


Having a RAID controller
that has eight internal SATA3 lanes, you can get 6 Gb/s on all eight drives. What if I
connect a 24 port SAS expander to an eight port RAID controller, do I still get max
throughput of 8 x 6 Gb/s, or am I able to get 24 x 6 Gb/s, assuming the expander is
rated for 6 Gb/s on all ports?



Of course the
PCIe bandwidth is going to limit it, as well as the RAID controller but is this right
theoritically speaking? PCIe 2.0 x8 has bandwidth of 4000 MB/s and PCIe 3.0 x8 has 7880
MB/s.



As an example, I was thinking of buying
LSI MegaRAID 9271-8i for my home server. It has eight internal SATA 6 Gb/s lanes. With
that one I am able to connect eight hard drives and they can work on their limits in
terms of transfer rates because there is one 6 Gb/s lane for each drive available. But
in the future the storage capacity might be too low. I thought I could just add a SAS
expander, like Intel RES2SV240. It is a 24 port expander rated for 6 Gb/s per port. So
do I get the full potential out of the expander, to have 6 Gb/s connection for all the
possible 24 drives? If so, could I buy the 9271-4i (has only four internal SATA ports)
and the Intel SAS expander to be able to connect up to 24 hard drives and have them work
at their full speed?


itemprop="text">
class="normal">Answer



Yes and
no...



Think about this: Your disks will not
perform at 6Gbps (unless they're SSDs). So some level of oversubscription is okay when
you go to using a SAS expander.




A
more common scenario is the use of an external JBOD storage enclosure. Those usually
have 1 or 2 x 4-lane SAS connectors linking them to the main server. Let's assume 4 x
6Gbps, so 24Gbps total bandwidth. Things are definitely oversubscribed there, as you may
have 24 disks linked at 6Gbps... but recall that most disks won't be able to achieve
more than 1.5 or 2Gbps in practice, so that level of oversubscription is
okay.



Remember, 6Gbps is just a link speed. You
will not be able to achieve that through an expander to all connected disks, because the
expander has upstream connections to a RAID controller. The RAID controller is the
limiting factor here.



See:
href="https://serverfault.com/questions/506583/do-sas-expanders-work-transparently-with-sas-controllers">Do
SAS expanders work transparently with SAS controllers?
/> href="https://serverfault.com/questions/510442/how-exactly-does-a-sas-sff-8087-breakout-cable-work-raid-connection-questions/510445#510445">How
exactly does a SAS SFF-8087 breakout cable work? + RAID/connection
questions


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able