Skip to main content

mac osx - multiple port-based apache vhosts on osx 10.6 not resolving properly



I have a few local versions of development websites on my local mac, and want to provide access to them from a browser through vhosts, as well as using the live (web) versions from time to time.



I have read many examples of people doing similar things by changing the URL, and having apache listen to the unique URL to serve from a local location. I have always done it using the same URL, but a different port, and while it works seamlessly on windows, I can't get it working on the mac.



(Let's say) I have two websites:




  1. amazingwebsite.com


  2. facebookiller.org



I want to access the local versions by using the same URL, by enabling the browser's proxy (with one click) which I have set to 8080. apache is set to Listen *:8080 in httpd.conf.



In httpd-vhosts.conf (which is getting loaded) I have:



NameVirtualHost *:8080



ServerAdmin webmaster@amazingwebsite.com
ServerName amazingwebsite.com
ServerAlias www.amazingwebsite.com
DocumentRoot "/Users/username/Development/Projects/amazingwebsite"


Options Includes Indexes Multiviews
AllowOverride All
Order allow,deny
Allow from all






The 'facebookkiller.org' vhost is basically the same - just different local location.



My /private/etc/hosts is now set to:



##

# Host Database
#
# localhost is used to configure the loopback interface
# when the system is booting. Do not change this entry.
##
127.0.0.1 localhost
255.255.255.255 broadcasthost
::1 localhost
fe80::1%lo0 localhost


127.0.0.1 amazingwebsite.com
127.0.0.1 facebookkiller.org


and after an apache restart (web sharing off/on), apachectl -S reports:



VirtualHost configuration:
wildcard NameVirtualHosts and _default_ servers:
*:8080 is a NameVirtualHost
default server amazingwebsite.com (/private/etc/apache2/other/httpd-vhosts.conf:4)

port 8080 namevhost amazingwebsite.com (/private/etc/apache2/other/httpd-vhosts.conf:4)
port 8080 namevhost facebookkiller.org (/private/etc/apache2/other/httpd-vhosts.conf:19)
Syntax OK


which looks ok to me.



The behaviour?:





  • amazingwebsite.com:8080 => local installation (correct)

  • www.amazingwebsite.com:8080 => times out (incorrect)

  • amazingwebsite.com => quickly can't connect, browser can't find - (incorrect)

  • www.amazingwebsite.com => goes to web version (correct)

  • facebookkiller.org:8080 => local installation (correct)

  • www.facebookkiller.org:8080 => times out (incorrect)

  • facebookkiller.com => browser can't find (incorrect)

  • www.facebookkiller.com => goes to web version (correct)




So my ServerAlias isn't working, or there is something wrong with my hosts file - or both!



I've spent ages on this, and could really do with some help - thanks..


Answer



The vhosts are working, you haven't written your local /etc/hosts correctly. What's happening is that your timeout-then-working is because a 'www.' lookup is most likely resulting in a real DNS CNAME pointer back to non-www. version.



127.0.0.1   localhost google.com www.google.com amazon.com www.amazon.com


That's how you use a hosts file - one IP listed one time, all aliases on the same line and you must list all subdomains needed, www. e.g. that will send traffic to your local Apache instance.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able