Skip to main content

java - Configure Database Properties for Tomcat Webapp



I setup a sample application in Tomcat but have trouble getting the database connection working. It is a standard WAR package written in Spring framework and uses a MySQL database.



The application is the Granny Address Book from http://www.cumulogic.com/downloads/sample-applications/.



I have deployed it under tomcat/webapps/ (Tomcat 7.0.42 with MySQL 5.1.73 running on the same host.)





  • Mysql DB name: grannydb

  • JNDI Name: MySqlGBDS



I cannot locate where to place the database connection settings, as it does not have the usual database.properties file. The only reference to database settings are in granny.xml:




MySQL-5.5.27
1

10

demo
demodemo
3306
UTF-8





But this file is not packaged inside the webapp (it comes separately,) and it's lacking a database host name.



I tried placing granny.xml inside the webapp, under WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/spring/ but it fails to connect to the database.



The current behavior is the webapp is starting but catalina.out warns:



 WARN : org.hibernate.cfg.SettingsFactory - Could not obtain connection
to query metadata org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.SQLNestedException:
Cannot create JDBC driver of class '' for connect URL 'null'



Where should granny.xml be placed?
What else is missing?



(Yes I did already create the database and user in MySQL. No tables are getting created by the app.)


Answer



If it uses JNDI you need to set up the database connection in either server.xml or context.xml.



As an administrator it is better to setup the database connection in server.xml, otherwise you end up unpacking and packing the WAR-file before each deployment.



Open server.xml. There should be a section called GlobalNamingResources. Here you add your database connection.




          driverClassName="com.mysql.jdbc.Driver" 
factory="org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool.DataSourceFactory"
jdbcInterceptors="org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool.interceptor.ConnectionState;org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool.interceptor.StatementFinalizer"
validationQuery="/* ping */"
testOnBorrow="true"
name="jdbc/MySqlGBDS"
username=""
password=""

type="javax.sql.DataSource"
url="jdbc:mysql:///grannydb" />


Hope this helps.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able