Skip to main content

apache 2.2 - setting permissions in user's home folder, to stop a 403 error




In my root folder on my school account I have a bunch of files and folders, e.g.,



$ ls
foobar.txt Private Public www


By default, all the files in Public/ and www/ are viewable on the web via myschool.edu/myusername/Public and myschool.edu/myusername/www. But how do I make foobar.html viewable? I want myschool.edu/myusername/foobar.txt to return the actual contents of foobar.txt, instead of a 403 error.



I tried setting permissions on foobar.txt (chmod 755 foobar.txt, and I even tried chmod 777 foobar.txt, so that the current permissions are -rwxrwxrwx), but I still get a 403 error.




If it matters, it looks like my school uses Apache/1.3.41 Server.



Reason I'm asking



I have no idea how, but I had a "stuff" folder in my home directory, and Google somehow managed to index and crawl its contents. So "myschool.edu/myusername/stuff/grr.html" now appears in Google's search results and cache, even though I still get a 403 error if I try to access the file myself.



So I want to verify ownership of my root folder on Google's webmaster tools, so that I can request removal. But to verify ownership of my root folder, I need to put a verification file "googlef197bd7510bd452a.html" in my root folder that doesn't return a 403 error.



[I've already deleted the damn folder, but I want to speed up Google's removal process.]



Answer



I think you'll have to bring this to the attention of you school's Sysadmin. The reason what you're attempting doesn't work, is that the Apache configuration has lines in it that dicatate that (for instance): Any folder found matching /home/*/Public, should be made available as /username/Public. Those rules tend to match speific folder names inside each home directory (In your case, Public and www)



Files that don't match that pettern will never be visible, which is usually a good thing as you don't want the private contents of you home directory shared with the world. Only the admin can change those rules.



I've never tried Google's removal procedure, though. Do they insist that the file has to be in the root of the website? ( myschool.edU/googlef197bd7510bd452a.html ) or can you specify where they should look for the file? If it's the former, then it looks as though they're trying to check ownership of the domain rather than your area of it. If that's the case, then you're probably stuck.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able