Skip to main content

apache 2.2 - Apache2 - Forward a value from URL param OR cookie, whichever is present



I managed to use apache to strip off a url param and stuff it in a header to be passed on to another server. See this question for reference.



Now I would like to add to this by getting the value for the header from a cookie if it's not present in the URL. Here's what I tried:





RewriteEngine On

RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} ^(.*)memberUuid=(.*)$
RewriteRule ^/(.*)$ http://127.0.0.1:9000/$1 [CO=memberUuid:%2:localhost,E=memberUuid:%2,P]

RewriteCond %{HTTP_COOKIE} memberUuid=(.*)
RewriteRule ^/(.*)$ http://127.0.0.1:9000/$1 [E=memberUuid:%2,P]

ProxyPreserveHost On

ProxyPass /excluded !
ProxyPass / http://127.0.0.1:9000/
ProxyPassReverse / http://127.0.0.1:9000/

Header add iv-user "%{memberUuid}e"
RequestHeader set iv-user "%{memberUuid}e"



This still works if the memberUuid is in the URL, but it doesn't seem to work with the cookie. I have the memberUuid cookie in my browser, but if I leave the URL param off, the iv-user header has an empty value.




I also tried ([^;]+) for my regular expression, as recommended in this post.



I'm sure that my mistake has a lot to do with me being a complete apache idiot. I'm a complete noob and not embarrassed to say it. Enlighten me please!



Edit



I've updated my virtual host so that apache will set the memberUuid cookie in the user's browser if it comes from the query string. That way, I can be sure that the cookie is present on the next request (I was previously having the destination server do this).


Answer



This might not be the only issue (I've never done cookie matching in mod_rewrite before); but I think it's because your backreference for the RewriteRule is still %2. You only have one parenthesised match in the previous RewriteCond, so it expands to nothing. Try [E=memberUuid:%1,P]



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able