Skip to main content

zfs - zpool import: volume FAULTED with corrupted data, is it possible to save some data?

I was using Freenas 8.2 and decided to upgrade to 9.2. All seem to go well, upgraded zfs to 28 and rebooted. During next boot it seem to take forever and at some point I decided to turn off the machine. I guess this is what caused the problem.




When I try to import I get the following:




[root@freenas] ~# zpool import
pool: vol4disks8tb
id: 12210439070254239230
state: FAULTED
status: The pool was last accessed by another system.
action: The pool cannot be imported due to damaged devices or data.

The pool may be active on another system, but can be imported using
the '-f' flag.
see: http://illumos.org/msg/ZFS-8000-EY
config:

vol4disks8tb FAULTED corrupted data
raidz2-0 ONLINE
gptid/3d316d16-f53e-11e1-9da5-080027dfca8a ONLINE
gptid/3df02143-f53e-11e1-9da5-080027dfca8a ONLINE
gptid/3eb99e55-f53e-11e1-9da5-080027dfca8a ONLINE

gptid/3f91c723-f53e-11e1-9da5-080027dfca8a ONLINE
[root@freenas] ~#


EDIT: The commands "zpool import -f", "zpool import -f -F -n" and "zpool import -f -F" return the exact same output as the previous command.



EDIT #2: the command "zpool import -f 12210439070254239230" returned




cannot import 'vol4disks8tb': I/O error

Destroy and re-create the pool from
a backup source.


I have so far tried the suggestions found in this answer and the "auto import volume" found in the web interface of freenas which writes this errors in /var/log/messages:




Jul 8 14:46:06 freenas manage.py: [middleware.notifier:3291] Importing vol4disks8tb [12210439070254239230] failed with: cannot import 'vol4disks8tb': I/O error
Jul 8 14:46:06 freenas manage.py: [middleware.exceptions:38] [MiddlewareError: The volume "vol4disks8tb" failed to import, for futher details check pool status]



Running "zpool status" returns "no pools available".



I don't care about most of the data on those disks, however I have close to 15 years of photos on those disks, is there any way to retrieve them? Please help!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able