Skip to main content

rsa - Can apache use a key agent to store private keys for SSL?



For mod_ssl in apache to work, you need your RSA private key on the server. If the key is passphrase protected, you have to enter the passphrase whenever you restart apache. There is SSLPassPhraseDialog so you can store the key encrypted and have a program pass it the phrase, but that really isn't any more secure than keeping it unencrypted.



I'm wondering if apache supports, or can be made to support, using a key agent for operations needing the private key, much like how ssh-agent for openssh works. That way I only need to type the passphrase to the key whenever the server itself reboots (assuming the agent doesn't die somehow during normal operations).




I realize that the key is stored in memory inside the agent, and obtaining it from memory possible, but it's hard to do. Also, if the agent is actually forwarded over ssh from another host and the key is in memory over there, then obtaining the private key is impossible, if just the webserver is compromised.



If the answer is "no" on apache currently supporting this, what is the answer on "can it be made to support this"? I'm unsure how the key operations work, and what level of exposure is needed on the private key, and figured I'd ask before I dove into the code to try and hack something together myself.


Answer



Your idea is interesting at first sight but it is not really relevant. Your proposal only pushes the security issue elsewhere.



Your Apache2 process will have to communicate with the "private key cache" thanks to IPC or API and this channel should be protected too or else an attacker may query the certificate easily.



So if you are not confident in your filesystem security to let your server certificate without passphrase, such a cache mechanism is not more secure.




By the way, there are only few reasons to fully restart Apache2 - like SSL configuration changes.
You should prefer the apachectl graceful command which does not require the certificate to be reloaded, and so you are not asked for the passphrase again.



Another idea: if your server security is well monitored thanks to IDS and file integrity checker and it raises an alert in case your system and your SSL certificate may have been compromised, then you can take the risk, rely on revocation lists and let your certificate without passphrase protection to ease your life.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able