linux - Server performance affected by MySQL memory consuption and CPU usage

Everyday during the peak time my server getting slow or down. Our hosting provider insisting us to upgrade the server but I think some performance tuning issue is there.

Adding the process information, server configuration and my.cnf parameters below.

Process Information

 PID  USER       PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND                                                  

 60848 mysql     20   0 34.8g  23g 6416 S 2196.2 82.1  16027:29 mysqld

Dedicated Server Configuration

Size:   'Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz', 2600MHz, 6 Core, Sockets: 2    
Image:  CentOS 6 64-bit with cPanel Fully-managed   
CPU:    Intel Dual Xeon E5-2620 v3
Speed:  2600MHz 
RAM:    32067MB 

CPUs:   2 Physical CPUs
Cores:  12 
Total Cores RAID:   Level 10
Disks:  4
Size:   917GB   
Type:   SSD

MySQL Configuration

[mysqld]
slow_query_log = 1
#long_query_time = 2
long_query_time = 2
slow_query_log_file = /var/lib/mysql/vps-slow.log
performance-schema=0
max_connections = 250
max_allowed_packet=128M
#skip-external-locking
key_buffer_size = 256M

open_files_limit = 50000
table_open_cache = 15000
sort_buffer_size = 6M
join_buffer_size = 6M
read_buffer_size = 1M
read_rnd_buffer_size = 15M
myisam_sort_buffer_size = 64M
query_cache_type=1
query_cache_limit=2M
query_cache_size=128M

max_heap_table_size = 96M
tmp_table_size = 96M
#low_priority_updates=1

thread_cache_size = 32
wait_timeout = 300
connect_timeout=15
interactive_timeout = 800

innodb_buffer_pool_size=4096M

innodb_buffer_pool_instances = 4

group_concat_max_len=1000000

default-storage-engine=MyISAM
innodb_file_per_table=1

[mysqldump]
quick

Please help me if there is anything wrong with the configuration ?

Do I really need to upgrade the server ?

PS: Hosted web application in the same server. Also WHM enabled for easy management.

Comments

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able

Blog

Search This Blog