Skip to main content

apache 2.2 - Can't start apache2 server



I'm getting the following error message while starting apache2 server:




$ sudo /etc/init.d/apache2 start * Starting

web server apache2
(98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to address
0.0.0.0:443 no listening sockets available, shutting down Unable to open logs Action 'start' failed. The Apache error log may have more
information.
[fail]




Here is the output of sudo netstat -lntup:



Active Internet connections (only servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State PID/Program name

tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:28017 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 941/mongod
tcp 0 0 127.0.1.1:53 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1355/dnsmasq
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:22 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 687/sshd
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:631 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 854/cupsd
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:27017 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 941/mongod
tcp6 0 0 :::22 :::* LISTEN 687/sshd
tcp6 0 0 ::1:631 :::* LISTEN 854/cupsd
udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:22543 0.0.0.0:* 1049/dhclient
udp 0 0 127.0.1.1:53 0.0.0.0:* 1355/dnsmasq
udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:68 0.0.0.0:* 1049/dhclient

udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:46027 0.0.0.0:* 901/avahi-daemon: r
udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:5353 0.0.0.0:* 901/avahi-daemon: r
udp6 0 0 :::38743 :::* 901/avahi-daemon: r
udp6 0 0 :::27403 :::* 1049/dhclient
udp6 0 0 :::5353 :::* 901/avahi-daemon: r


Anyone knows why and how it should be fixed?



Thanks!!!



Answer



Apache gives this same error message when you have two Listen directives that target the same IP/port combination. The first one succeeds without error, the second one finds that something is already listening on that port and aborts.



It's not uncommon to find these directives in different files, such as vhost files or top-level files such as ports.conf or ssl.conf.



You can find them with grep -r Listen /etc/apache2 or grep -r Listen /etc/httpd depending on whether you are using a Debian-based distro or a RedHat-based distro.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able