Skip to main content

ubuntu - Port is listening but cannot connect from remote





I have a catalyst server running on a VM.



[info] Hello powered by Catalyst 5.90103                                                                                                                                             
HTTP::Server::PSGI: Accepting connections at http://0:3009/



And connecting within the VM



vagrant@precise32:/var/log/apache2$ curl 'http://localhost:3009'
DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
etc ...


The port seems to be listening



vagrant@precise32:/var/log/apache2$ netstat -an | grep "LISTEN "

tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:36300 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:111 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:80 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:22 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:3009 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN


Connecting remotely I can see port 80 but not 3009



curl 'http://localhost:80'

curl: (52) Empty reply from server
curl 'http://localhost:3009'
curl: (7) Failed to connect to localhost port 3009: Connection refused


I've seen similar threads but nothing has helped. This is iptables



vagrant@precise32:/var/log/apache2$ sudo iptables -L
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination

ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:ssh
ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:http
ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere ctstate RELATED,ESTABLISHED

Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination

Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination



And the firewall is turned off



vagrant@precise32:/var/log/apache2$ sudo ufw status  
Status: inactive


I'm very new at VM, I'm not sure if this is a hosts problem, an apache problem or a cataylst problem. I did try running a python server and couldn't connect to that either. All advice is much appreciated. Thanks



EDIT - I've looked at similar posts, the general solutions there are not listening ports or firewall. I don't think either applies here.



Answer



You are trying to access the app on vagrant box listening on port 3009, using address localhost remotely. For this to work, you need to setup the port forwarding correctly as mentioned in the vagrant doc: https://docs.vagrantup.com/v2/getting-started/networking.html



Check and make sure, it is setup correctly and that the request on http://localhost:3009 is forwarded to the vagrant box. You should also make sure that your local firewall is not blocking connection to the port.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able