Skip to main content

linux - How do I allow sendmail to send TO any address?

UPDATE 10/21/2010 5p: Ok, so sending mail does work, but not sending mail to tom@wtw3.com from this box does not. The A record for wtw3.com points to the development box, but the MX records resolve to Google's servers. Is this causing the issue? How do I tell? (Verbose mail output below)



[root@dev ~]# mail -v tom@wtw3.com
Subject: Test
Test

Cc:
tom@wtw3.com... Connecting to [127.0.0.1] via relay...
220 dev.tridiumtech.com ESMTP Sendmail 8.13.8/8.13.8; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:02:05 -0400
>>> EHLO dev.tridiumtech.com
250-dev.tridiumtech.com Hello localhost [127.0.0.1], pleased to meet you
250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
250-PIPELINING
250-8BITMIME
250-SIZE
250-DSN

250-ETRN
250-DELIVERBY
250 HELP
>>> MAIL From: SIZE=37
250 2.1.0 ... Sender ok
>>> RCPT To:
>>> DATA
550 5.1.1 ... User unknown
503 5.0.0 Need RCPT (recipient)
>>> RSET

250 2.0.0 Reset state
>>> RSET
250 2.0.0 Reset state
root... Using cached ESMTP connection to [127.0.0.1] via relay...
>>> MAIL From:<> SIZE=1061
250 2.1.0 <>... Sender ok
>>> RCPT To:
>>> DATA
250 2.1.5 ... Recipient ok
354 Enter mail, end with "." on a line by itself

>>> .
250 2.0.0 o9LL25mA024437 Message accepted for delivery
root... Sent (o9LL25mA024437 Message accepted for delivery)
Closing connection to [127.0.0.1]
>>> QUIT
221 2.0.0 dev.tridiumtech.com closing connection


ORIGINAL QUESTION:




I am having problems when sending mail OUT from my development server.



Unless I send mail TO a user that begins with a username that exists on my box, the mail will reject and say "User unknown".



For instance, I have a user on my dev box called "twilson". Therefore, I can send email to any address that begins with "twilson", such as twilson@blahblah.com, and it will send without any issue.



But, I do not have a user "tom" on my box, so when I go to send email to tom@blahblah.com it will reject saying:




Oct 21 10:07:49 dev sendmail[19638]: o9LE7mcV019638: < tom@localhost >... User unknown





It actually takes whatever the username of the emailing address I am sending TO is and places it on the local hostname.



Why is it doing this??? How can I correct the configuration so that I can send OUT to ANYONE?



Thanks,
Tom



Additional Info:




ADDRESS TEST RESULT:



> > 3,0 fred@teaparty.net
canonify input: fred @ teaparty . net
Canonify2 input: fred < @ teaparty . net >
Canonify2 returns: fred < @ teaparty . net . >
canonify returns: fred < @ teaparty . net . >
parse input: fred < @ teaparty . net . >
Parse0 input: fred < @ teaparty . net . >

Parse0 returns: fred < @ teaparty . net . >
ParseLocal input: fred < @ teaparty . net . >
ParseLocal returns: fred < @ teaparty . net . >
Parse1 input: fred < @ teaparty . net . >
Mailertable input: < teaparty . net > fred < @ teaparty . net . >
Mailertable input: teaparty . < net > fred < @ teaparty . net . >
Mailertable returns: fred < @ teaparty . net . >
Mailertable returns: fred < @ teaparty . net . >
MailerToTriple input: < > fred < @ teaparty . net . >
MailerToTriple returns: fred < @ teaparty . net . >

Parse1 returns: $# esmtp $@ teaparty . net . $: fred < @ teaparty . net . >
parse returns: $# esmtp $@ teaparty . net . $: fred < @ teaparty . net . >


DNS TEST:



;; ANSWER SECTION:
teaparty.net. 3600 IN MX 5 www.teaparty.net.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - Awstats - outputting stats for merged Access_logs only producing stats for one server's log

I've been attempting this for two weeks and I've accessed countless number of sites on this issue and it seems there is something I'm not getting here and I'm at a lost. I manged to figure out how to merge logs from two servers together. (Taking care to only merge the matching domains together) The logs from the first server span from 15 Dec 2012 to 8 April 2014 The logs from the second server span from 2 Mar 2014 to 9 April 2014 I was able to successfully merge them using the logresolvemerge.pl script simply enermerating each log and > out_putting_it_to_file Looking at the two logs from each server the format seems exactly the same. The problem I'm having is producing the stats page for the logs. The command I've boiled it down to is /usr/share/awstats/tools/awstats_buildstaticpages.pl -configdir=/home/User/Documents/conf/ -config=example.com awstatsprog=/usr/share/awstats/wwwroot/cgi-bin/awstats.pl dir=/home/User/Documents/parced -month=all -year=all...

iLO 3 Firmware Update (HP Proliant DL380 G7)

The iLO web interface allows me to upload a .bin file ( Obtain the firmware image (.bin) file from the Online ROM Flash Component for HP Integrated Lights-Out. ) The iLO web interface redirects me to a page in the HP support website ( http://www.hp.com/go/iLO ) where I am supposed to find this .bin firmware, but no luck for me. The support website is a mess and very slow, badly categorized and generally unusable. Where can I find this .bin file? The only related link I am able to find asks me about my server operating system (what does this have to do with the iLO?!) and lets me download an .iso with no .bin file And also a related question: what is the latest iLO 3 version? (for Proliant DL380 G7, not sure if the iLO is tied to the server model)

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits, ...