Skip to main content

CentOS Adding Hard Disks



I currently have a server with 500GB storage (2 physical disks, raid 0) and its already full. I've asked my provider for an upgrade of additional 1TB storage (2 physical, raid 0). These are all hardware based raid.



Almost all files from /usr/local/nginx/html are videos and have consumed the first hard disk raid. Now I wanna know that if I purchased this additional hard disk, would any file saved into the same directory be automatically saved into the newly added hard disk?



Because what Im doing is Im hosting video files on that directory, and I want to continue saving on that particular directory only.



Answer



You'd be better served by backing up your data, and having your host re-provision (meaning re-install the OS) the server with (4) 1TB drives in RAID10 for fault-tolerance and speed. This usually doesn't add much to the bottom-line monthly price of the server but if your host doesn't have an inventory of 1TB drives, picking them up at current market prices of 250%+ of what they were just 6 months ago might be costly.



If that isn't an option and you're well aware of the real potential for data-loss with RAID0 in production, then what I would suggest is carving your new RAID0 into an LVM (the RAID0 unit will be one physical volume, 1 volume group, and 1 logical volume).



pv0 - Use the RAID0 device (md0 if software RAID, or probably sdX if hardware RAID)
vg0 - Use all of the space (the entire 1TB of the RAID device)
lv0 - Do not use all of the space in the volume group. Allocate maybe 500GB of 1TB and format it as an ext3 filesystem. Mount it to a temporary location (/mnt/temp for instance), and move your video file data to it. Then remount the device at the existing location of the video data:



mount /dev/mapper/vg0/lv0 /usr/local/nginx/html



Create the appropriate fstab entry (man fstab). Now having left extra space on vg0 you have the option to use that space elsewhere on the server should another directory fill the 500GB partition, or the ability to add more space to vg0 as needed.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able