Skip to main content

Correct way to setup linux company share folder with usable permissions

I've just started working for a small company that has a globally shared folder run from an Ubuntu file server (Raid 5, etc) shared by Samba.
The workstations (Centos) are all fstab setup to mount this samba share in their root file system -> /Data/.



The client fstab configs :



//10.1.1.3/DATA01 /DATA01 cifs  username=username,password=password 0 0



The samba configuration for the share :



[DATA01]
path = /DATA01
writeable = yes


Before I started the boss had decided he'd had enough of unix permissions and user mismatch "problems", so every workstation and server has the same user and group name (the current project name) - we'll call this project. He'd also made sure that the User UID on every machine was identical - i'm not sure how important this is at a practical level.



So in short, a ls -l /Data results in items that are chowned by project : project.




This is what I've just walked into. My job here is to administer all of this, but i'll add i'm a windows programmer by experience so my Linux sysadmin knowledge is more theoretical than practical (I took the job to learn their industry as i'm attempting a career pivot).



So the setup works to an extent, as Bob and Mary can add/edit files etc under /Data and no "you do not have permission" errors happen, which I believe was the Boss' main boggle. So it seems weird to me as security is totally out the window, but it practically works.



But this makes me terrified of when project finishes and project2 starts. This is 3 months away and i'm not sure how to handle this. I know he'll say "just chown -R project2:project2 /Data, reimage all machines to have that user, and move on", but i'm sure there's a better solution.



So i'm wondering from this setup how can I have unique users manage /Data without causing "you do not have permission" errors?



Additionally I'm wondering is there a kind of linux equivalent of "Active Directory" that can be setup to administrate users and groups (for projects) in the company? I've no idea how this problem is usually managed in the linux world.




And anything else I should consider?



Sorry if this is Linux 101 stuff but i'm not sure how it's typically managed and practically pulled off.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?
Post a Comment
Read more

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,
Post a Comment
Read more

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able
Post a Comment
Read more