Skip to main content

active directory - Convert SBS 2003 domain to Server 2008 R2 Standard - will this work?



I have been tasked with converting an SBS 2003 domain to Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard. The customer plans to expand past the limitations of SBS, and does not use Exchange Server at all. Here's the current set up:



City A: This is the client's original first location. There is one server here running SBS 2003. It performs domain controller and fileserver roles, and has all the FSMO roles because it's SBS.




City B: The client set up a branch at this location with a server running Windows Server 2008. It also acts as a domain controller and fileserver.



The client wants to move away from Small Business Server, so they have decided to upgrade the server in City A to Server 2008 R2 Standard. It will continue to provide the same services it is currently providing. They have opted not to purchase new server hardware, so the upgrade must be "in-place".



I am seeking feedback on the following upgrade plan:




  1. Back up files and system state from SBS server using ntbackup

  2. Shut down the SBS server and image the RAID5 array using Ghost or Acronis

  3. Re-start the SBS server


  4. Shut down the 2008 server in City B
  5. Set up a desktop temporarily with Server 2008 R2 in City A and run DCPROMO

  6. Shut down SBS server

  7. Use temporary server to seize FSMO roles

  8. Reformat and install Server 2008 R2 on original SBS box

  9. Run DCPROMO on new 2008 R2 box and transfer FSMO roles to it

  10. Install services and transfer files to new 2008 R2 server

  11. Verify that domain is working for clients, then bring City B's server back online




And my back-out procedure:




  1. Turn off servers in City A

  2. Restore SBS server in City A using Ghosted image

  3. Verify connectivity then restart server in City B


Answer



(Answering myself...)




No, this won't work. Shutting down the server in City B while the FSMO roles are seized from the server in City A will effectively orphan the server the City B, as it will no longer have a point of contact into the network.



Alternate solutions would be to leave the server in City B online, or even to use that server to seize FSMO roles.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?
Post a Comment
Read more

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,
Post a Comment
Read more

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able
Post a Comment
Read more