Skip to main content

Which steps are required to avoid my server being considered as spam sender?



I'm looking to set up a webmail server that will be used by a lots of users that will receive and send emails. They will also have the possibility to forward emails they receive.



I'd like to know which steps are recommanded/required to indicate to others Mail services (GMail, Outlook, etc) that my server is not used as a spam sender (disclaimer : IT's NOT ! :p) but a legitimate one.



I know I have to define a SPF TXT records for example, but what others steps would you recommend me to do ?




For example, is there a formula like having a proportional number of servers based on the amount of email sent (for having a different IP address) ? (something like sending a maximum of 1M emails / per IP / per day ?)



Something else I'm missing ?



I tried to search online, but I mostly find how to avoid emails sent with scripts (like PHP) being put in the SPAM folder.



I'm looking for a server/dns configuration side.



Thanks a lot for your help/tips, I appreciate !


Answer





  1. Ensure your server is not an open relay, meaning that it must not relay to arbitrary destinations for arbitrary senders without authentication.

  2. Make sure that your SMTP software is configured to send an appropriate FQDN along with its HELO/EHLO statement. Configuration will depend on the SMTP server you are running, but you need to make sure it is identifying itself with a publicly-resolvable fully qualified domain name.

  3. Make sure you have an A/AAAA record in DNS for the FQDN noted in step 2, with the correct IP mapped to your server.

  4. Make sure there is a PTR record corresponding to your A/AAAA record.

  5. Make sure that the SPF record(s) for any domain that will send through your server are configured to allow that server as a sender.

  6. Potentially set up DKIM, depending on your server software and requirements.

  7. If you run into trouble, check your server's external IP(s) against various online blacklists.

  8. MOST IMPORTANTLY: If you can use an external service for SMTP like MailGun, SendGrid, etc, consider doing so. SMTP is one of those things like DNS in that for most people/businesses, running it themselves is really more trouble than it's worth.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?
Post a Comment
Read more

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,
Post a Comment
Read more

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able
Post a Comment
Read more