Skip to main content

amazon ec2 - Unable to start the Phusion Passenger - Cannot change the directory - Operation not permitted (errno=1)



I'm running Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.4 (Santiago) on Amazon EC2.



I have installed Phusion Passenger via a gem.



When I start httpd I have this error message in less /var/log/httpd/error_log





[Tue Jan 21 08:07:43 2014] [notice] SELinux policy enabled; httpd
running as context unconfined_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0



[Tue Jan 21 08:07:43 2014] [notice] suEXEC mechanism enabled (wrapper:
/usr/sbin/suexec)



[Tue Jan 21 08:07:43 2014] [error] *** Passenger could not be
initialized because of this error: Unable to start the Phusion
Passenger watchdog because it encountered the following error during

startup: Cannot change the directory
'/tmp/passenger.1.0.2072/generation-0/buffered_uploads' its UID to 48
and GID to 48: Operation not permitted (errno=1)




Output of sestatus




SELinux status: enabled




SELinuxfs mount: /selinux



Current mode: enforcing



Mode from config file: enforcing



Policy version: 24



Policy from config file: targeted





Content of /var/log/audit/audit.log related to PassengerWatchd




type=AVC msg=audit(1390309663.196:134): avc: denied { sys_resource }
for pid=2077 comm="PassengerWatchd" capability=24
scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:httpd_sys_script_t:s0
tcontext=unconfined_u:system_r:httpd_sys_script_t:s0 tclass=capability
type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1390309663.196:134): arch=c000003e syscall=1
success=no exit=-13 a0=5 a1=7f0c303ad000 a2=6 a3=ffffffff items=0

ppid=2075 pid=2077 auid=500 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0
sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=4 comm="PassengerWatchd"
exe="/opt/walk-manager/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.0.0/gems/passenger-4.0.26/buildout/agents/PassengerWatchdog"
subj=unconfined_u:system_r:httpd_sys_script_t:s0 key=(null)




I'm new to SELinux so I don't know what other information I can provide here



I've made the installation of my entire project as root and as root I'm trying to start httpd the default user ec2-user doesn't have permission to start httpd


Answer




There are two approaches:




  1. disable SELinux

  2. go through the SELinux audit log and add exceptions for the service. See here. Essentially you would need to use audit2allow to create the exceptions, restart HTTPD, find the next set of exceptions and repeat until you go them all.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able