Skip to main content

linux - Correct Permissions VPS /var/www




This is a repost of an "off-topic" question on stackoverflow.



My scenario is:



I created a user and added that user to sudoers:



visudo


user ALL=(ALL) ALL



Then



sudo adduser user www-data


and



chown www-data:www-data -R /var/www


Did a service restart, then tried:




scp file user@ip:/var/www


Permission denied



The permissions I had applied for folders then files were (not wp-config.php or .htaccess):



drwxr-xr-x


-rw-rw-r--



I tried:

sudo chmod -R g+w /var/www
I was then able upload files to /var/www, but this set permissions to 775, so I ran:

find /var/www -type d -exec chmod 755 {} \;


Now I can edit files but not write to the folder via SFTP or SSHFS etc.



My question now is:



How do I write to /var/www without compromising security?



Answer



The sudo change affects only commands that you run with sudo command. Therefore it has no effect in this case.



I would prefer making user the owner of all files in /var/www. Then, you can chmod 777 all the directories and chmod 666 all the files that WP needs write access to. With this, if someone exploits a security issue in WP, he cannot overwrite WP files that easily.



Alternatively you can change the owner to www-data for files / directories WP needs write access to. However, this way user can not write to those files / directories.



If your server filesystem supports ACLs, you can add an ACL to /var/www which gives write permission for some other user than the owner. This can be achieved with setfacl command.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able