Skip to main content

All my emails to Yahoo!, Hotmail and AOL are going to Spam, though I've implemented every validation method (works for Gmail though)

I've implemented everything and checked everything (SPF, DomainKey, DKIM, reverse lookup), and only Gmail is allowing my emails to go to Inbox. Yahoo, Hotmail and AOL are all sending my messages to Spam. What am I doing wrong? Please help!




Following are the headers of messages to Yahoo, Hotmail and AOL. I've changed names and domain names. The domain names I'm sending mail from are polluxapp.com and gemini.polluxapp.com.



Yahoo:




From Shift Licensing Tue Jan 26 21:55:14 2010

X-Apparently-To: gamerfromhell13@yahoo.com via 98.136.167.163; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:59:12 -0800

Return-Path:

X-YahooFilteredBulk: 208.115.108.162

X-YMailISG:
gPlFT1YWLDtTsHSCXAO2fxuGq5RdrsMxPffmkJFHiQyZW.2RGdDQ8OEpzWDYPS.MS_D5mvpu928sYN_86mQ2inD9zVLaVNyVVrmzIFCOHJO2gPwIG8c2
L8WajG4ZRgoTwMFHkyEsefYtRLMg8AmHKnkS0PkPscwpVHtuUD91ghsTSqs4lxEMqhqw60US0cwMn_r_DrWNEUg_sESZsYeZpJcCCPL0wd6zcfKmtYaIk
idsth3gWJPJgpwWtkgPvwsJUU_cmAQ8hAQ7RVM1usEs80PzihTLDR1yKc4RJCsesaf4NUO_yN1cPsbFyiaazKikC.eiQk4Z3VU.8O5Vd8i7mPNyOeAjyt
7IgeA_

X-Originating-IP: [208.115.108.162]


Authentication-Results: mta1035.mail.sk1.yahoo.com from=example.com; domainkeys=pass (ok); from=example.com;
dkim=permerror (bad sig)

Received: from 127.0.0.1 (EHLO gemini.example.com) (208.115.108.162)

by mta1035.mail.sk1.yahoo.com with SMTP; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:59:12 -0800

Received: from gemini.example.com (gemini [127.0.0.1])

by gemini.example.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3984E21A0167

for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:55:14 -0800 (PST)

DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=example.com; h=to

:subject:from:content-type:message-id:date; s=mail; bh=bRIHfxE3S

e+YeCrIOqziZsiESJA=; b=J+D56Czff+6wGjQycLEvHyT32+06Nngf+6h7Ep6DL

SmmJv3ihiAFJIJiPxiwLNpUsOSHhwJYjYQtynbBnag40A6EUBIsucDR+VoEYD+Cc


9L0dV3QD5D77VpG9PnRQDQa91R+NPIt5og9xbYfUWJ1b/jXkZopb0VTM+H9tandM

24=

DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=example.com; h=to:subject

:from:content-type:message-id:date; q=dns; s=mail; b=pO5YvvjGTXs

3Qa83Ibq9woLq5VSsxUD5uoSrjNrW9ICMmdWyJpb9oT5byFR9hMthomTmfGWkkh6

3VxtD0hb0HVonN+1iheqJ9QBBOctadLCAOPZV3mfA99XUu7Y0DR2qtkU/UkSe8In

5PENWFbwub88ZsRDiW3hCbNHl+UO8Jsc=

Received: by gemini.example.com (Postfix, from userid 502)

id 386DE21A0166; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:55:14 -0800 (PST)

To: gamerfromhell13@yahoo.com


Subject: Shift License For James Xavier

From: "Shift Licensing"

Content-type: text/html

Message-Id: <20100126215514.386DE21A0166@gemini.example.com>

Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:55:14 -0800 (PST)
Content-Length: 282`




Hotmail:





X-Message-Delivery: Vj0xLjE7dXM9MDtsPTA7YT0wO0Q9MjtTQ0w9Ng==

X-Message-Status: n:0

X-SID-PRA: james@gemini.example.com

X-AUTH-Result: NONE

X-Message-Info: 6sSXyD95QpWzUBaRfzf3NMbaiSGCCYGXSczlzLw49r01I25elu3oYM0V2uNa8BV2O7DOiFEeewTBKMtN+PW+ig==

Received: from gemini.example.com ([208.115.108.162]) by snt0-mc4-f7.Snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft
SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);

Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:18:53 -0800

Received: from gemini.example.com (gemini [127.0.0.1])

by gemini.example.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9431321A0167


for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:18:53 -0800 (PST)

DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gemini.example.com; h=to

:subject:message-id:date:from; s=mail; bh=DLF0k+uELpY6If5o3SWlSj

7j0vw=; b=nAMpb47xTVh73y6a2rf6V1rtYHuufr46dtuwWtHyFC85QKfZJReJJL

oFIPjgEC28/1wSdy8VbfLG1g64W1hvnJjet3rcyv3ANNYxnFaiH5yt3SDEiLxydS

gjCmNcZXyiVsWtpv7atVRO/t/Own+oFB9zz/9mj43Bhm4bnZ2cTno=

DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gemini.example.com; h=to

:subject:message-id:date:from; q=dns; s=mail; b=sFpNxlskyz4MYT38

BA/rQ6ZAcQjhy7STkLPckrCDVVZcE4/zukHyARq7guMtYCCEjXoIbVEtNikPC97F

cGpJGGZrppTGjx62N0flxG8hvwejiJYnUJF1EIP4JckGWyEI+21vtWLLQ27eegtN


fs9OkIQ2iUPC/4u8N1eqiff0VZU=

Received: by gemini.example.com (Postfix, from userid 504)

id 8ED7221A0166; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:18:53 -0800 (PST)

To: james.xavier@hotmail.com

Subject: Testing this

Message-Id: <20100126211853.8ED7221A0166@gemini.example.com>

Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:18:53 -0800 (PST)

From: james@gemini.example.com

Return-Path: james@gemini.example.com

X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jan 2010 21:18:54.0039 (UTC) FILETIME=[29CEE670:01CA9ECD]





AOL:





X-AOL-UID: 3158.1902377530

X-AOL-DATE: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 5:07:23 PM Eastern Standard Time

Return-Path:

Received: from rly-mg06.mx.aol.com (rly-mg06.mail.aol.com [172.20.83.112]) by air-mg06.mail.aol.com (v126.13) with
ESMTP id MAILINMG061-a1d4b5f6787a4; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:07:22 -0500

Received: from gemini.example.com (gemini.example.com [208.115.108.162]) by rly-mg06.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with
ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMG067-a1d4b5f6787a4; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:07:04 -0500


Received: from gemini.example.com (gemini [127.0.0.1])

by gemini.example.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32B3821A0167

for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:07:03 -0800 (PST)

DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gemini.example.com; h=to

:subject:message-id:date:from; s=mail; bh=RL0GLHd3dZ8IlIHoHIhA/U

cLtUE=; b=BKg4p3qnaIdFRjAbvUa+Hwcyc6W91v4B4hN95dVymJrxyUBycWMUSC

nzKmJ5QllhCYjwO+S7GrRdmlFpjBaK8kt2qmdCyC2UuiDF6xY6MXx/DBF56QpYtZ

YDY4kXdiEMSbooH14B4CCPhaCTdC1wCtV0diat3EANCLxSDYAYq5k=

DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gemini.example.com; h=to

:subject:message-id:date:from; q=dns; s=mail; b=fDSjNpfWs7TfGXda


uio8qbJIyD+UmPL+C0GM1VeeV8FADj6JiYIT1nT3iBwSHlrLFCJ1wxPbE4d9CGl8

gQkPIV6T4TL7ha052nur0EOWoBLoBAOmhTshF/gsIY+/KMibbIczuRyTgIGVV5Tw

GZVGFddVFOYgee7SAu0KNFm7aIk=

Received: by gemini.example.com (Postfix, from userid 504)

id 2D5F521A0166; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:07:03 -0800 (PST)

To: jamesxavier@aol.com

Subject: Testing

Message-Id: <20100126220703.2D5F521A0166@gemini.example.com>

Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:07:03 -0800 (PST)

From: james@gemini.example.com


X-AOL-IP: 208.115.108.162

X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d227.1 ; domain : gemini.example.com DKIM : pass

X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version)

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?
Post a Comment
Read more

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,
Post a Comment
Read more

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able
Post a Comment
Read more