Skip to main content

Spam emails regarding Domain Abuse Notices



I have received domain abuse notice email from chloe-gray@icann-monitor.org.



The mail asks to download a Word Document which I believe contains a virus.




Dear Domain Owner,



Our system has detected that your domain: example.com is being used for spamming and spreading malware recently.




You can download the detailed abuse report of your domain along with date/time of incidents. Click Here



We have also provided detailed instruction on how to delist your domain from our blacklisting.



Please download the report immediately and take proper action within 24 hours otherwise your domain will be suspended permanently.



There is also possibility of legal action depend on severity and persistence of your abuse case.



Three Simple Steps:





  1. Download your abuse report.

  2. Check your domain abuse incidents along with date and time.

  3. Take few simple steps for prevention and to avoid domain suspension.



Click Here to Download your Report



Please look into it and contact us.





I want to know if I have missed enabling/configuring something on the ISP side or did I leave some email address on my domain because of which these spammers have targeted me as well.



Are there ways to protect / configure my domain to avoid these emails?


Answer



This is spam at the least - at worst, it's a scam. Do not agree to send a read receipt. Do not download unnecessary content. Do not click links. Do not reply. Do not pass Go... etc.



As others have mentioned, protecting your contact details in whois information may help eliminate these emails; I'd also like to add some common signs of spam/scam emails:





  • "Dear "
    Legitimate organisations will attempt to use your real name where they can - for example, by taking it from whois information, or by contacting your domain registrar to obtain your name and contact details.

  • "Click Here"
    Legitimate (especially formal, like this) emails are drafted by people who are paid to come up with something better than "click this" for link text - "visit our website to retrieve the full report", perhaps.

  • Bad grammar
    Legitimate emails are written by people who are paid to write good English - and then they're copy-checked before they ever get sent out. "There is also possibility", "depend on severity", and Unnecessary Capital Letters are generally not things that make it into professional communications.

  • Legal threats
    People are more likely to get scared and do what the scammers want them to if they're threatened with things they don't understand, like legal proceedings - even if the threats aren't actionable.

  • Unreasonable time limits
    If a legitimate organisation needs to time-limit you, it'll be on a scale of weeks, or multiple days at the very shortest. It's highly unusual to be given just 24 hours to perform some action - unless, of course, someone wants to scare you into taking action without thinking about it first.

  • Unexpected attachment types
    Attachments such as official reports will usually come as PDFs, or a link to a legitimate webpage. Anything else - an RTF, a Word document, a HTML file, or an executable, should raise a question.



None of these are 100% perfect indicators of scams, but each should raise a small flag - and the presence of multiple should make you highly suspicious. If in doubt, verify the organisation is legitimate, look up a contact email address for them (not the address the email came from, usually), and use that to ask if the email is legitimate. If it is, fine - if it's not, you've done them a favour.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able