Skip to main content

networking - KVM bridge network initial setup - 2 public IPs

I have actually two problems with my server. The setup is like this:




  • server in a data center connected directly to the internet

  • one network card / two public IPs (one IP the server gets over DHCP, the other has to be configured manually)

  • Debian wheezy as kvm host

  • Debian wheezy as guest




First problem is that I don't get network connection on the guest at all.
Second problem is that I want the guest to responde to one of the IP addresses. The second IP I want to use to manage the host.



Let's start with the first problem.
Here is the interfaces file of the host:



auto lo
iface lo inet loopback


auto eth0
iface eth0 inet manual

auto eth0:0
iface eth0:0 inet static
address XX.YYY.ZZZ.161
network XX.YYY.ZZZ.161
netmask 255.255.255.255
broadcast XX.YYY.ZZZ.255
gateway AA.BBB.CCC.1


auto br0
iface br0 inet dhcp
bridge_ports eth0
bridge_stp off
bridge_maxwait 0
bridge_fd 0


With this configuration br0 gets the IP address from DHCP and I can reach the host server on both IP addresses. The host can also ping Google. Very well.




Now I start the guest.



root@debianvmhost:~# brctl show

bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
br0 8000.002590a31dee no eth0
vnet0



Seems like the vm is connected to the bridge.



root@debianvmhost:~# ps -ef | grep qemu

/usr/bin/kvm ...
-netdev tap,fd=20,id=hostnet0,vhost=on,vhostfd=21
-device virtio-net-pci,netdev=hostnet0,id=net0,
mac=52:54:xx:xx:xx:xx,bus=pci.0,addr=0x3



So far, so good.
But the vm does not get any IP address. When I manually set one of the public IP addresses I still do not get network access. I cannot poing th IP address of Google, the network is not reachable.



What do I do wrong?



Thanks in advance



Jaroslaw



Edit:

Sorry, commenting does not work on my mobile.
The hoster is Strato.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able