Skip to main content

bind - BIND9 private DNS server with OpenVPN config file errors



I am setting up a private DNS server that will only be accessible by my OpenVPN users. OpenVPN is setup on the tun0 interface of my Ubuntu 14 server.



The issue is that I am getting some errors. I am unsure how to resolve them. Also I am unsure if if configured my BIND9 server correctly.



Here is what I get when I test my configs:



named-checkconf:





Nothing...




named-checkzone one.example.com db.one.example.com:




db.one.example.com:17: ignoring out-of-zone data
(jeannicolas.com.air.jn) zone one.example.com/IN: loaded serial 3 OK





named-checkzone 8.10.in-addr.arpa /etc/bind/zones/db.10.8:




dns_rdata_fromtext: /etc/bind/zones/db.10.8:6: near eol: unexpected end of input
zone 8.10.in-addr.arpa/IN: loading from master file /etc/bind/zones/db.10.8 failed: unexpected end of input
zone 8.10.in-addr.arpa/IN: not loaded due to errors.




ifconfig details for OpenVPN:





tun0
Link encap:UNSPEC HWaddr 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00
inet addr:10.8.0.1 P-t-P:10.8.0.2 Mask:255.255.255.255
UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:3646 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:3957 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:476530 (476.5 KB) TX bytes:2238555 (2.2 MB)





named.conf.local



zone "one.example.com" {
        type master;
        file "/etc/bind/zones/db.one.example.com"; # zone file path
#       allow-transfer { 10.128.20.12; };         # ns2 private IP address - secondary
};

zone "8.10.in-addr.arpa" {
        type master;

        file "/etc/bind/zones/db.10.8";  # 10.8.0/24 subnet
#       allow-transfer { 10.128.20.12; };  # ns2 private IP address - secondary
};

zone "jn." {
        type master;
        file "/etc/bind/db.jn";
};



named.conf.options



acl "trusted" {
#       127.0.0.1;
        10.8.0/24;
#       10.8.1.0/24;
};

options {
        directory "/var/cache/bind";


        recursion yes;                 # enables resursive queries
        allow-recursion { trusted; };  # allows recursive queries from "trusted" clients
#       listen-on { 127.0.0.1; };   # ns1 private IP address - listen on private network only
        listen-on { 10.8.0/24 };
        allow-transfer { none; };      # disable zone transfers by default

        forwarders {
                8.8.8.8;
                8.8.4.4;

        };
};


db.10.8



$TTL    604800
@       IN      SOA     one.example.com.        admin.one.example.com. (
                                3       ; Serial
                           604800       ; Refresh

                          2419200       ; Retry
                           604800 )     ; Negative Cache TTL
; name servers
        IN      NS      ns1.one.example.com.

; PTR Records
3.0     IN      PTR     ns1.one.example.com.    ; 10.8.0.3


db.one.example.com




$TTL    604800
@       IN      SOA     ns1.one.example.com. admin.one.example.com. (
                                3       ; Serial
                           604800       ; Refresh
                            86400       ; Retry
                          2419200       ; Expire
                           604800       ; Negative Cache TTL
)
;

; name servers - NS records
        IN      NS      ns1.one.example.com.

; name servers - A records
ns1.one.example.com.            IN      A       10.8.0.3

; 10.8.0.0/16 - A records
jeannicolas.com.air.jn.         IN      A       10.8.0.100



db.jn



;
; BIND data file for TLD ".jn"
;
$TTL    604800
@       IN      SOA     jn.     root.jn. (
                          3             ; Serial
                     604800             ; Refresh
                      86400             ; Retry

                    2419200             ; Expire
                     604800 )           ; Negative Cache TTL
;
@       IN      NS      ns1.jn.
@       IN      A       10.8.0.100

Answer



The problem was simple. I did not add a Expire number db.10.8 zone file.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?
Post a Comment
Read more

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,
Post a Comment
Read more

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able
Post a Comment
Read more