Skip to main content

amazon web services - AWS DNS DDoS mitigation




I have an AWS server that is currently under DDoS via DNS amplification. I've setup CloudWatch logs for the VPC ACL and it's logging an enormous amount of rejected DNS traffic. Despite that traffic being rejected, my primary server is unreachable.



I have a secondary server on the same VPC and subnet that can be reached without any problem.



Why is it that I can access one but not the other? The ACL should be filtering the traffic at the subnet level. So if one is unreachable then they both should be unreachable, but that's not the case.



And how does one mitigate a DNS amplification attack on AWS? AWS certainly has big enough pipes. Why is the ACL not doing the job?


Answer



I ended up solving the issue.




There were a couple issues actually. I had only blocked UDP port 53 (DNS) and as it turns out there were other ports being attacked. Since my server is just a web server I was able to block all UDP traffic in the ACL. That solved one side of the attack.



They were also overloading my web server with large post requests from compromised WordPress installs. I was able to add a few lines to my Nginx configuration that dropped requests from WordPress user agents and also block large post requests.



These were the settings I used in the http section of the Nginx config



    client_max_body_size 10k;
client_body_buffer_size 10k;
client_header_buffer_size 1k;

large_client_header_buffers 2 1k;
client_body_timeout 6;
client_header_timeout 6;
keepalive_timeout 5;
send_timeout 10;


Then in the server section of the Nginx config I setup a drop for WordPress and wget initiated requests



if ($http_user_agent ~* (wordpress|wget)) {

return 403;
}


These settings made the server a lot more difficult to bring down



I also used iptables to rate limit incoming http connections



# Rate limit new connections to port 80
-A INPUT -p tcp -m recent --dport 80 -m state --state NEW --set

-A INPUT -p tcp -m recent --dport 80 -m state --state NEW --update --seconds 20 --hitcount 20 -j DROP


Then I used iptables to limit the maximum number of simultaneous connections to port 80.



# Limit concurrent connections for a class B to port 80
-A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 80 --tcp-flags FIN,SYN,RST,ACK SYN -m connlimit --connlimit-above 10 --connlimit-mask 16 --connlimit-saddr -j REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset
-A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT



These things together made my servers much more difficult to DDoS. I'm now using multiple front end servers to reverse proxy requests to a backend server. I setup DNS round robin to expose the multiple IP addresses. This last additional step increased the amount of total bandwidth I could handle in an attack that got past all the other defenses.



So far the remaining attacks have not been able to take down my server.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able