Skip to main content

tcpip - How can I add more than 255 machines to a single Class C network?











I'm mainly a programmer. I have no idea beyond some basic theory when it comes to Networking/Administrating.



My university feels that we should course at least the basics in Networking and I'm psyched. It's something incredibly new to me and I'm enjoying the class a lot.



Yesterday was my first day and he posed the following question.




"Since each C-level network can only have a maximum of 254 IP addresses, how could you add 300 machines to a single C-level network?



I was thinking something like:



192.168.1.1 
192.168.1.2
192.168.1.3
---
192.168.1.254 (Make this a ROUTER)

//and inside this router's network I could repeat the following addresses no problem.
192.168.1.1
192.168.1.2
//etc.


Is this what my teacher was talking about? My teacher said this has a special name and we should research what it was called.



Anyone care to share some knowledge? :)




Edit: Maybe I'm not expressing my question clear enough; I need to have 300 machines all being able to communicate with each other, and all of them being within the same C-level network. (This is a deprecated term you say, what is it called now?)



How could I write this solution down on paper, explaining what I need?


Answer



I'm fairly certain that the concept your teacher is pointing you towards is NAT (Network Address Translation). It's a function performed by a router which allows a (usually private) network to share a (usually public) IP address. This is one of the primary functions of any off the shelf router you use to connect a home network to an Internet connection.



In your example, you cannot repeat usage of the same subnet on the "internal" network.



A brief explanation, given the following configuration:




192.168.1.0/24
|
192.168.1.1 (external interface)
Router performing NAT
192.168.2.1 (internal interface)
|
192.168.2.0/24


The router performing NAT would have hosts behind it on a different subnet (notice the "2" in the 3rd octet). The hosts in the 192.168.2.0/24 network would set the NAT router (192.168.2.1) as their gateway.




When traffic flows through the router, the NAT function "translates" the IP headers, changing the source address to it's own "external" IP (192.168.1.1) and forwards the traffic along. It then keeps a table of connection entries, so when the return traffic arrives, it reverses the translation it performed and forwards the reply back to the original sender on the "internal" network.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_address_translation


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

ubuntu - Monitoring CPU, Mem, disk, on a single server

I've been looking for a simple starter solution for monitoring my [currently] single server hosted solution. Other than Nagios and similar, are there other good (simple) solutions people are using? Answer Everything depends on what you want. For example Munin is very simple, you can install and configure it in less then 10 minutes (on one server), it can sends alarms, make graphs from monitoring cpu, mem. apache connections, eaccellerator, disk io and many many more (it has many plugins). But if you are planning in future get some more machines, munin may not be enough. For example in munin you cant monitor state of individual processes, can't monitor changes in files (for security purpose). So if you wanna only see what is the utilization of basics parameters on your server and don't plan to buy some more servers Munin is what you are looking for, but if you wanna be alarmed when some of your service is down, take more control on what is happeninig on...

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits, ...