Skip to main content

networking - Very slow ssh, snmp, telnet network connections but http, sftp are fast




I have a small network with about 8 linux servers, a Cisco 2600 router, and a Cisco 3500XL switch. The router and switch have been configured and working properly for years.



About 6 hours ago the time to establish a connection via certain protocols skyrocketed. Connecting to a server via SSH can take a couple minutes to establish. But once the connection is made, it works normally. Copying files via scp is fast as well, but making the initial connection takes forever. Same with telnet.



However, connection via HTTP or HTTPS are perfectly fine. They cruise along like normal. Also SFTP seems to be fine as well.



SNMP connections also seem to be affected. My Cacti monitoring server has stopped working properly with timeout errors in the logs. PHPSVR: Poller[0] Maximum runtime of 292 seconds exceeded for the Script Server. Exiting. It gets intermittent, but mostly failed results from the hosts, however it is fairly reliable in reporting the router and switch cpu and memory.



The strange thing about the snmp monitoring of the switch is that some switch ports continue to be reported and show up in the cacti graphs, and others stop about 6 hours ago. But logging into the switch CLI shows activity on those ports.




My colo facility claims they have no networking issues at this time. I do think it is something in my network, but can't figure out what. I'm not seeing any significant traffic spikes and I can perform DNS queries without problems (dig queries taking around 34 msec). The delay happens even when connecting between hosts inside the network.



Any pointers on how to proceed troubleshooting this? I've reloaded both the switch and router and the problem continues. The following shows the output of ssh -vv with some comments that indicate how many seconds of a delay there were at different points in the login process.
https://gist.github.com/963682


Answer



Your name resolution has broken.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able