Skip to main content

filesystems - How does Linux handle concurrent disk IO?



When a Linux server is serving many concurrent requests to read many different files, does it:





  1. Seek to File_1, read the entire file, then seek to File_2, read the entire file, then seek to File_3, etc etc


  2. Seek to File_1, read part of it (up to the readahead value?), then seek to File_2, read part of it, then seek back to File_1 where it has left off, read more of it, then seek to File_3, etc, etc




If it's the 2nd case, then the server is doing a lot more seeks than is necessary, which would slow things down significantly. In that case is there any tuning I could do?


Answer



In disk I/O there is a thing called elevator. The disk subsytem tries to avoid thrashing the disk head all over the platters. It will re-order I/O requests (when not prohibitted e.g. by a barrier) so that the head will be moving from the inside of the disk to the outside, and back, performing requested I/Os on the way.



Second thing is I/O request merging. If there are many requests within a short time window, which access different portions of the file, the I/O subsystem will try and get all the data in one go, instead of issuing several disjointed requests.




As far as tuning goes. If you are the application writer, there's a lot you can do. You can issue large, sequential I/Os, whenever you can and use fsync() et.al. when you need to be sure that the data is on the platters.



If you are a sysadmin, and you absolutely know, that the data requests of 2 apps leapfrog, and they try to read files sequentially (e.g. you have 2 DVDs being transcoded in parallel), then yes, increasing readahead should help. Otherwise you'd need to take a look at your I/O patterns and sizes, consider your RAID level (if any) and other factors, before doing any tuning. Look at what your real bottlenecks are, before you start tuning, it may be difficult to guess, what's really limiting your system.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able