Skip to main content

dhcp - lan to wan connection refused by windows firewall

I have plenty of experience with LAN's and bridges however this is my first time using a WAN style setup...



here is a diagram of my network



WAN (public ip & 10.1.10.1)---COMP1 (10.1.10.2)
                           ---
                           ---LAN(10.1.10.3 & 192.168.1.1) --- COMP2 (192.168.1.2)



the WAN gateway of LAN is setup as 10.1.10.1
and the port forward rules



WAN:A -> COMP1:B
WAN:C -> LAN(10.1.10.3):D
LAN:D -> COMP2:D


from the public internet connecting to WAN(public ip):C connects me to COMP2:D




from COMP1 connecting to LAN(10.1.10.3):D connects me to COMP2:D. However netstat on COMP2 lists the connection as LOCAL(COMP2:D) REMOTE(COMP2:XYZ) when I was expecting REMOTE(COMP1:XYZ)



Yet the connection COMP2->WAN:A never works... I don't know what's wrong.
What would make COMP2 think a remote connection from an external network was from itself? Shouldn't LAN see a 10.1.10.? destination address and quickly route it to the WAN gateway which should then treat it as a normal LAN local packet address?



I don't see any custom NAT rules on either router as far as I can tell.





COMP1





  • IP: 10.1.10.2

  • SUBNET MASK: 255.255.255.0

  • IP GATEWAY: 10.1.10.1

  • DHCP SERVER: ...

  • DNS SERVER: ...



COMP2





  • IP: 192.168.1.2

  • SUBNET MASK: 255.255.255.0

  • default gateway 192.168.1.1

  • dns server: 10.1.10.1

  • $ ip r



    default via 192.168.1.1 dev eth0  proto static  metric 1024
    169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0  scope link  metric 1000

    192.168.1.0/24 dev eth0  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.1.2





couldn't justify fiddling with network settings so instead I just moved COMP2 directly to WAN and it still didn't work... turns out it was windows firewall that wasn't working correctly, even with a port exception to allow any program to listen on port B on any network from any ip from any port... disabling windows firewall ends up being the only solution...



FIREWALL DETAILS




General




  • Enabled: checked

  • Action: Allow the connection



    Programs and Services


  • Programs: All programs that meet the specified conditions


  • Application Packages/Services: Apply to all.../Apply to all...




    Remote Computers


  • Only allow connections from these computers: unchecked


  • Skip the rule for connections from these computers: unchecked



    Protocols and Ports


  • Protocol type: TCP


  • Local port: Specific Ports: 8080

  • Remote port: All Ports



    Scope



  • Local Ip address: Any IP addres


  • Remote IP address: Any IP address



    Advanced


  • Domain profile: checked


  • Private profile: checked

  • Public profile: checked

  • Interface types: all interface types

  • edge traversal: allow edge traversal




    Local Principals


  • Only allow connections from these users: unchecked


  • Skip this rule for connections from these users: unchecked



    Remote Users


  • Only allow connections from these users: unchecked


  • Skip this rule for connections from these users: unchecked



just checked again and port 8080 only works if I disable the windows 'public' firewall, the 'private' firewall doesn't block port 8080... (note COMP2 now has the ip 10.1.10.3 because it is now connected directly to WAN like COMP1)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - Awstats - outputting stats for merged Access_logs only producing stats for one server's log

I've been attempting this for two weeks and I've accessed countless number of sites on this issue and it seems there is something I'm not getting here and I'm at a lost. I manged to figure out how to merge logs from two servers together. (Taking care to only merge the matching domains together) The logs from the first server span from 15 Dec 2012 to 8 April 2014 The logs from the second server span from 2 Mar 2014 to 9 April 2014 I was able to successfully merge them using the logresolvemerge.pl script simply enermerating each log and > out_putting_it_to_file Looking at the two logs from each server the format seems exactly the same. The problem I'm having is producing the stats page for the logs. The command I've boiled it down to is /usr/share/awstats/tools/awstats_buildstaticpages.pl -configdir=/home/User/Documents/conf/ -config=example.com awstatsprog=/usr/share/awstats/wwwroot/cgi-bin/awstats.pl dir=/home/User/Documents/parced -month=all -year=all...
Post a Comment
Read more

iLO 3 Firmware Update (HP Proliant DL380 G7)

The iLO web interface allows me to upload a .bin file ( Obtain the firmware image (.bin) file from the Online ROM Flash Component for HP Integrated Lights-Out. ) The iLO web interface redirects me to a page in the HP support website ( http://www.hp.com/go/iLO ) where I am supposed to find this .bin firmware, but no luck for me. The support website is a mess and very slow, badly categorized and generally unusable. Where can I find this .bin file? The only related link I am able to find asks me about my server operating system (what does this have to do with the iLO?!) and lets me download an .iso with no .bin file And also a related question: what is the latest iLO 3 version? (for Proliant DL380 G7, not sure if the iLO is tied to the server model)
Post a Comment
Read more

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits, ...
Post a Comment
Read more