Skip to main content

centos - Mounted disk disappears after reboot




I've got a Centos 7 dedicated server with a SSD + a nvme ssd with 400gb. I followed a tutorial to mount + format (as xfs filesystem) the nvme disk so that I could setup my NoSQL databases on that drive. However every time I reboot my server the disk disappears and the mounted folder is empty again.



What commands I ran to mount the disk:



fdisk -l


Returned:





Disk /dev/nvme0n1: 400.1 GB, 400088457216 bytes, 781422768 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical):
512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512
bytes



Disk /dev/sda: 275.1 GB, 275064201216 bytes, 537234768 sectors Units =
sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512
bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk label type: dos Disk identifier: 0x000b09ac




Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 2048 2050047 1024000 83 Linux
/dev/sda2 2050048 528844799 263397376 83 Linux
/dev/sda3 528844800 537233407 4194304 82 Linux swap /
Solaris




mkfs.xfs /dev/nvme0n1 -f (-f was required after the first time)
mkdir /database
mount /dev/nvme0n1 /database



Afterwards it lists the drive when I run df -h, but once I restart it also disappears from that list. What am I doing wrong?


Answer



Try adding this to /etc/fstab:



/dev/nvme0n1 /database xfs defaults 0 0


That should do the trick.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able