Skip to main content

virtualization - Consumer (or prosumer) SSD's vs. fast HDD in a server environment




What are the pro's and con's of consumer SSDs vs. fast 10-15k spinning drives in a server environment? We cannot use enterprise SSDs in our case as they are prohibitively expensive. Here's some notes about our particular use case:




  • Hypervisor with 5-10 VM's max. No individual VM will be crazy i/o intensive.

  • Internal RAID 10, no SAN/NAS...



I know that enterprise SSDs:





  1. are rated for longer lifespans

  2. and perform more consistently over long periods



than consumer SSDs... but does that mean consumer SSDs are completely unsuitable for a server environment, or will they still perform better than fast spinning drives?



Since we're protected via RAID/backup, I'm more concerned about performance over lifespan (as long as lifespan isn't expected to be crazy low).


Answer



Note: This answer is specific to the server components described in the OP's comment.





  • Compatibility is going to dictate everything here.

  • Dell PERC array controllers are LSI devices. So anything that works on an LSI controller should be okay.

  • Your ability to monitor the health of your RAID array is paramount. Since this is Dell, ensure you have the appropriate agents, alarms and monitoring in place to report on errors from your PERC controller.

  • Don't use RAID5. We don't do that anymore in the sysadmin world.

  • Keep a cold spare handy.

  • You don't necessarily have to go to a consumer disk. There are enterprise SSD drives available at all price points. I urge people to buy SAS SSDs instead of SATA wherever possible.

  • In addition, you can probably find better pricing on the officially supported equipment as well (nobody pays retail).

  • Don't listen to voodoo about rotating SSD drives out to try to outsmart the RAID controller or its wear-leveling algorithms. The use case you've described won't have a significant impact on the life of the disks.




Also see: Are SSD drives as reliable as mechanical drives (2013)?


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?
Post a Comment
Read more

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,
Post a Comment
Read more

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able
Post a Comment
Read more