Skip to main content

networking - Windows server, temporary alias name, only visible from one machine

Two weeks ago our IT department migrated a huge network folder from an older server to a newer one. For example, the older folder was reachable under



 \\oldserver\ourfolder



and the new one under



 \\newserver\ourfolder


Note the old server is still in use and visible in our companies network, \\oldserver\ourfolder was archived in between and deleted from the server.



Now we found out that there are several files (actually CAD files in some proprietary binary format) having hardcoded references pointing to the old folder location. Since there are several of those files, we would like to write a program to change those references to the new location. Unfortunately, the CAD system's VBA interpreter will only allow this when the referenced files are visible under the old network path. Otherwise, it will stop execution with an error message



So what we need here is a way to make "oldserver" an alias name for "newserver". This should be done only temporary, and only for one machine (a Windows 7 client), so our first idea was to use the hosts and lmhosts files for this. But this apparently does not work. We added a line of the form




    oldserver


to the hosts file and



    oldserver #PRE


to the lmhosts file. ping oldserver then shows the new IP address, but this does not have any effect on the shared network folders, for example, displayed by the Windows explorer, or other applications like our CAD application.




Second thing we tried was to setup an isolated DNS server on the local machine with the old server pointing to the IP address of the new one, and using "127.0.0.1" as preferred DNS (and no, we did not forget to flush the DNS cache by ipconfig /flushdns). After this, nslookup oldserver shows the expected IP address of the new server, but Windows Explorer still sees the old server under its name.



I guess this has something to do with WINS and how NetBIOS name resolution works, but I have no clue what I could try else.



Note this is about the way one client sees the network, so I think it must be possible not to change anything on the involved servers, only the client.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able