Skip to main content

apache 2.2 - Multiple SSL domains on the same IP address and same port?





This is a Canonical Question about Hosting multiple SSL websites on the same IP.




I was under the impression that each SSL Certificate required it's own unique IP Address/Port combination. But the answer to a previous question I posted is at odds with this claim.




Using information from that Question, I was able to get multiple SSL certificates to work on the same IP address and on port 443. I am very confused as to why this works given the assumption above and reinforced by others that each SSL domain website on the same server requires its own IP/Port.



I am suspicious that I did something wrong. Can multiple SSL Certificates be used this way?


Answer




For the most up-to-date information on Apache and SNI, including additional HTTP-Specific RFCs, please refer to the Apache Wiki








FYsI: "Multiple (different) SSL certificates on one IP" is brought to you by the magic of TLS Upgrading.
It works with newer Apache servers (2.2.x) and reasonably recent browsers (don't know versions off the top of my head).



RFC 2817 (upgrading to TLS within HTTP/1.1) has the gory details, but basically it works for a lot of people (if not the majority).
You can reproduce the old funky behavior with openssl's s_client command (or any "old enough" browser) though.



Edit to add: apparently curl can show you what's happening here better than openssl:







SSLv3



mikeg@flexo% curl -v -v -v -3 https://www.yummyskin.com
* About to connect() to www.yummyskin.com port 443 (#0)
* Trying 69.164.214.79... connected
* Connected to www.yummyskin.com (69.164.214.79) port 443 (#0)
* successfully set certificate verify locations:
* CAfile: /usr/local/share/certs/ca-root-nss.crt
CApath: none
* SSLv3, TLS handshake, Client hello (1):

* SSLv3, TLS handshake, Server hello (2):
* SSLv3, TLS handshake, CERT (11):
* SSLv3, TLS handshake, Server key exchange (12):
* SSLv3, TLS handshake, Server finished (14):
* SSLv3, TLS handshake, Client key exchange (16):
* SSLv3, TLS change cipher, Client hello (1):
* SSLv3, TLS handshake, Finished (20):
* SSLv3, TLS change cipher, Client hello (1):
* SSLv3, TLS handshake, Finished (20):
* SSL connection using DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA

* Server certificate:
* subject: serialNumber=wq8O9mhOSp9fY9JcmaJUrFNWWrANURzJ; C=CA;
O=staging.bossystem.org; OU=GT07932874;
OU=See www.rapidssl.com/resources/cps (c)10;
OU=Domain Control Validated - RapidSSL(R);
CN=staging.bossystem.org
* start date: 2010-02-03 18:53:53 GMT
* expire date: 2011-02-06 13:21:08 GMT
* SSL: certificate subject name 'staging.bossystem.org'
does not match target host name 'www.yummyskin.com'

* Closing connection #0
* SSLv3, TLS alert, Client hello (1):
curl: (51) SSL: certificate subject name 'staging.bossystem.org'
does not match target host name 'www.yummyskin.com'





TLSv1




mikeg@flexo% curl -v -v -v -1 https://www.yummyskin.com
* About to connect() to www.yummyskin.com port 443 (#0)
* Trying 69.164.214.79... connected
* Connected to www.yummyskin.com (69.164.214.79) port 443 (#0)
* successfully set certificate verify locations:
* CAfile: /usr/local/share/certs/ca-root-nss.crt
CApath: none
* SSLv3, TLS handshake, Client hello (1):
* SSLv3, TLS handshake, Server hello (2):
* SSLv3, TLS handshake, CERT (11):

* SSLv3, TLS handshake, Server key exchange (12):
* SSLv3, TLS handshake, Server finished (14):
* SSLv3, TLS handshake, Client key exchange (16):
* SSLv3, TLS change cipher, Client hello (1):
* SSLv3, TLS handshake, Finished (20):
* SSLv3, TLS change cipher, Client hello (1):
* SSLv3, TLS handshake, Finished (20):
* SSL connection using DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA
* Server certificate:
* subject: C=CA; O=www.yummyskin.com; OU=GT13670640;

OU=See www.rapidssl.com/resources/cps (c)09;
OU=Domain Control Validated - RapidSSL(R);
CN=www.yummyskin.com
* start date: 2009-04-24 15:48:15 GMT
* expire date: 2010-04-25 15:48:15 GMT
* common name: www.yummyskin.com (matched)
* issuer: C=US; O=Equifax Secure Inc.; CN=Equifax Secure Global eBusiness CA-1
* SSL certificate verify ok.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able