Skip to main content

networking - can telnet to a service, but not access service ports directly

We're running a variety of services on our cloud provider. Everything normally works fine, but occaisionally we end up with issues connecting to 1 host (which has our repos on it). We haven't been able to find a solution to the connectivity problem, so we completely rebuilt the host at a different cloud provider. Things had been running fine, but the same connectivity issue is starting again. I'll try to summarize clearly:



The host that is having connectivity issues is running Gitlab. We also ssh into that host a fair amount.



When we run into connectivity issues, we cannot access ssh, git, https etc. Pinging the host works fine. I can telnet to port 22, and get a response:



Connected to xyz.
Escape character is '^]'.
SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_7.6p1 Ubuntu-4ubuntu0.1




I can access any port on the host via Telnet, and I get back a response immediately. If I try to connect to the same host via ssh, I get:



ssh -v -v me@xyz
OpenSSH_7.9p1, LibreSSL 2.7.3
debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
debug1: /etc/ssh/ssh_config line 48: Applying options for *
debug2: resolve_canonicalize: hostname xyz is address
debug2: ssh_connect_direct
debug1: Connecting to xyz [xyz] port 22.
debug1: connect to address xyz port 22: Operation timed out
ssh: connect to host xyz port 22: Operation timed out




If I disconnect from our local network, and connect via hotspot to the Internet, I'm able to access said host properly. This only happens to users on our corporate network.



I went down the path of checking all our local routers/firewalls, and couldn't find any issue. I then connected to the Internet from the external side of our corporate firewall, and the connectivity issues immediately started again.



I've spoken with our cloud provider (Google) and they see nothing wrong with our cloud configuration or servers. I've spoken with our Internet provider, and they can't see anything wrong either.



Anyone have any ideas?



Thanks.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able