Skip to main content

ssh - OpenSSH disable ControlMaster for given hostname

I am using OpenSSH_5.9p1, OpenSSL 0.9.8r 8 Feb 2011 with Mac OS X Snow Leopard. I have ControlMaster feature configured to maintain persistent connections. My ~/.ssh/config have the following:




Host *
  ControlPath /ms/%r@%h:%p
  ControlMaster auto
  ControlPersist 4h

Host *.unfuddle.com
  ControlMaster no


However, from what I see - even when I am trying to use SSH for unfuddle.com hosts, master connection get always created:





[andrey-mbp ~]$ ssh -v git@droolit.unfuddle.com
OpenSSH_5.9p1, OpenSSL 0.9.8r 8 Feb 2011
debug1: Reading configuration data /Users/akhkharu/.ssh/config
debug1: /Users/akhkharu/.ssh/config line 1: Applying options for *
debug1: /Users/akhkharu/.ssh/config line 6: Applying options for *.unfuddle.com
debug1: Reading configuration data /usr/local/Cellar/openssh/5.9p1/etc/ssh_config
debug1: auto-mux: Trying existing master
debug1: Control socket "/ms/git@droolit.unfuddle.com:22" does not exist

debug1: Connecting to droolit.unfuddle.com [174.129.5.196] port 22.
debug1: Connection established.
debug1: identity file /Users/akhkharu/.ssh/id_rsa type 1
debug1: identity file /Users/akhkharu/.ssh/id_rsa-cert type -1
debug1: identity file /Users/akhkharu/.ssh/id_dsa type 2
debug1: identity file /Users/akhkharu/.ssh/id_dsa-cert type -1
debug1: identity file /Users/akhkharu/.ssh/id_ecdsa type -1
debug1: identity file /Users/akhkharu/.ssh/id_ecdsa-cert type -1
debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version OpenSSH_5.8
debug1: match: OpenSSH_5.8 pat OpenSSH*

debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0
debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_5.9
debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent
debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received
debug1: kex: server->client aes128-ctr hmac-md5 none
debug1: kex: client->server aes128-ctr hmac-md5 none
debug1: sending SSH2_MSG_KEX_ECDH_INIT
debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_ECDH_REPLY
debug1: Server host key: RSA a6:74:33:36:95:31:6e:a6:d7:71:87:b8:3c:38:e2:60
debug1: Host 'droolit.unfuddle.com' is known and matches the RSA host key.

debug1: Found key in /Users/akhkharu/.ssh/known_hosts:390
debug1: ssh_rsa_verify: signature correct
debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent
debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS
debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received
debug1: Roaming not allowed by server
debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent
debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received
debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey
debug1: Next authentication method: publickey

debug1: Offering RSA public key: /Users/akhkharu/.ssh/id_rsa
debug1: Server accepts key: pkalg ssh-rsa blen 277
debug1: Authentication succeeded (publickey).
Authenticated to droolit.unfuddle.com ([174.129.5.196]:22).
debug1: setting up multiplex master socket
debug1: channel 0: new [/ms/git@droolit.unfuddle.com:22]
debug1: control_persist_detach: backgrounding master process
debug1: forking to background
debug1: Entering interactive session.
debug1: multiplexing control connection

debug1: channel 1: new [mux-control]
debug1: channel 2: new [client-session]
debug1: Remote: Forced command.
debug1: Remote: Port forwarding disabled.
debug1: Remote: X11 forwarding disabled.
debug1: Remote: Agent forwarding disabled.
debug1: Remote: Pty allocation disabled.
debug1: Remote: Forced command.
debug1: Remote: Port forwarding disabled.
debug1: Remote: X11 forwarding disabled.

debug1: Remote: Agent forwarding disabled.
debug1: Remote: Pty allocation disabled.
debug1: mux_client_request_session: master session id: 2
PTY allocation request failed
Need SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND
debug1: client_input_channel_req: channel 2 rtype exit-status reply 0
debug1: client_input_channel_req: channel 2 rtype eow@openssh.com reply 0
debug1: channel 2: free: client-session, nchannels 3
debug1: channel 1: free: mux-control, nchannels 2
Shared connection to droolit.unfuddle.com closed.




[andrey-mbp ~]$ ll /ms/
total 0
srw-------  1 akhkharu  admin     0B Jul 17 11:55 git@droolit.unfuddle.com:22


Thanks,
Andrey.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?
Post a Comment
Read more

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,
Post a Comment
Read more

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able
Post a Comment
Read more