Skip to main content

Allow Permissions for Multiple FTP Users to Edit Public HTML Folder - Linux



On a dedicated server hosting one website, running Linux with no control panel, I'm trying to grant permission for multiple users to edit the public HTML folder (/var/www/html/).



I want to make sure I do this the best way, I imagine if I set the permissions loosely via CHMOD, it will allow anyone who can reach the folder via FTP to change it. Is the solution to set up a wheel group, add the intended users to the wheel group, and then set the permissions to the wheel group?




Right now, only one user can edit the public HTML.


Answer



Your solution is pretty close to what I'd recommend, but why do you specifically reference the wheel group? On many distributions the group wheel has full access to the sudo command granting then full root access to the system.



Let's assume you make a new group called webadmins:



groupadd webadmins



Then you want to set the proper permissions to allow your webadmins to make changes:



chown root:webadmins /var/www/html -R


The -R will set the permissions on all existing files. One issue that's common is if joe creates a file in /var/www/html it will, by default, be owned by joe and grouped to joe's default group. We can remedy this by setting the SETGID bit on the parent directory so new files will be grouped to webadmins by default:



chmod g+s /var/www/html



One last issue is that your webserver will need to access these files as well. I, personally, don't like to leave global read access on /var/www/html because of the likelihood that someone will drop a .php script in there, so I set the directory to 770:



chmod 770 /var/www/html


And then I add the apache user (www-data on RedHat systems, typically) to the webadmins group:



usermod -aG webadmins www-data



Hope that helps!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able