Skip to main content

Active Directory Site/Domain Interactions



I'm having an issue wrapping my head around the myriad Active Directory components, and I'm hoping I can get some opinions or corrections from someone.




At our workplace, we used to have individual active directory domains and sites for each different office location we have. Each location also had a pair of domain controllers that was responsible for that location, and would be used by any stations within that location to manage authentication, GPOs, etc.



Recently, as part of another project, we condensed down all of our domains into our old top level domain. The sites in A/D remained the same, but each individual user account, computer, etc. was moved into the top level domain. Each pair of local DC's was deprecated to just one DC that was a member of the top level domain.



After finishing this, we ran into issues where we were getting -very- slow replication between DCs. The secondary issue of that was individual stations or users seemed to be authenticating against any DC they felt like. On a single station, I found that the user authenticated against one, was receiving DNS from another, and pulling GPOs from somewhere else (I may be mixing this up but you get the idea). It seemed to be essentially random which DC would be contacted by a given station, even though all the DCs were still a member of the proper A/D "sites".



To remedy this problem, we made all the DC's members of the same "top level" site so that replication would essentially be instantaneous. It may sound kind of icky to have that many DCs perpetually replicating to each other, but we run a fairly small setup so there wasn't any major concerns.



My question is, did we go wrong somewhere? I'm currently working on an SCCM install, and only now am I finding out that this is (to put it lightly) not Microsoft's recommended way to do things. My main concerns are:




1) Is this going to bite us later down the road, especially with us being in the midst of trying to set up a stable SCCM install.



2) Can anyone explain why the DC's were getting hit seemingly at random by authentication requests, even though we had them in their corresponding A/D sites (which to the best of my knowledge should give them priority for local requests from stations within the same site).



Thanks!


Answer



There is a bit too much to really handle here in a single question.



First, don't start setting up SCCM without getting AD working correctly. Yes, it will bite you later down the road if you don't fix AD first.




Second, Moving your DC's all to the same site is not a good start. Move the DC's back to their respective sites in AD, make sure your subnets are defined and assigned correctly. If you want to manage replicate, take a look at defining specific site connectors to meet your needs. Take a look at fixing the replication issues before doing something drastic (dcdiag/etc to troubleshoot). Make sure your DNS is clean and working. Take a look at your DHCP settings to make sure the proper DNS servers are getting assigned to the workstations. Make sure your DC's are set with the correct DNS servers.



If you want to go beyond this, find a reputable vendor to work with your to get your environment right.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - Awstats - outputting stats for merged Access_logs only producing stats for one server's log

I've been attempting this for two weeks and I've accessed countless number of sites on this issue and it seems there is something I'm not getting here and I'm at a lost. I manged to figure out how to merge logs from two servers together. (Taking care to only merge the matching domains together) The logs from the first server span from 15 Dec 2012 to 8 April 2014 The logs from the second server span from 2 Mar 2014 to 9 April 2014 I was able to successfully merge them using the logresolvemerge.pl script simply enermerating each log and > out_putting_it_to_file Looking at the two logs from each server the format seems exactly the same. The problem I'm having is producing the stats page for the logs. The command I've boiled it down to is /usr/share/awstats/tools/awstats_buildstaticpages.pl -configdir=/home/User/Documents/conf/ -config=example.com awstatsprog=/usr/share/awstats/wwwroot/cgi-bin/awstats.pl dir=/home/User/Documents/parced -month=all -year=all...

iLO 3 Firmware Update (HP Proliant DL380 G7)

The iLO web interface allows me to upload a .bin file ( Obtain the firmware image (.bin) file from the Online ROM Flash Component for HP Integrated Lights-Out. ) The iLO web interface redirects me to a page in the HP support website ( http://www.hp.com/go/iLO ) where I am supposed to find this .bin firmware, but no luck for me. The support website is a mess and very slow, badly categorized and generally unusable. Where can I find this .bin file? The only related link I am able to find asks me about my server operating system (what does this have to do with the iLO?!) and lets me download an .iso with no .bin file And also a related question: what is the latest iLO 3 version? (for Proliant DL380 G7, not sure if the iLO is tied to the server model)

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits, ...