Skip to main content

linux - Cent OS: How do I turn off or reduce memory overcommitment, and is it safe to do it?




From time to time "my" server stalls because it runs out of both memory and swap space. (it keeps responding to ping but nothing more than that, not even ssh).



I'm told linux does memory overcommitment, which as far as I understand is the same as banks do with money: it grants to processes more memory than actually available, assuming that most processes won't actually use all the memory they ask, at least not all at the same time.



Please assume this is actually the cause why my system occasionally hangs, let's not discuss here whether or not this is the case
(see What can cause ALL services on a server to go down, yet still responding to ping? and how to figure out).



So,





  1. how do I disable or reduce drastically memory overcommitment in CentOS? I've read there are two settings called vm.overcommit_memory (values 0, 1, or 2) and vm.overcommit_ratiom but I have no idea where I have to find and change them (some configuration file hopefully), what values should I try, and whether I need to reboot the server to make the changes effective.


  2. and is it safe? What side effects could I expect?
    When googling for overcommit_memory I find scary things like people saying their server can't boot anymore....




Since what causes the sudden increase in memory usage is mysql because of queries that are made by php which in turn is called while serving http requests, I would expect just some php script to fail to complete and hence some 500 response from time to time when the server is too busy, which is a risk I can take (certainly better that have the whole server become inaccessible and have to hard reboot it).



Or can it really cause my server to be unable to reboot if I choose the wrong settings?


Answer



Memory overcommit can be disabled by vm.overcommit_memory=2




0 is the default mode, where kernel heuristically determines the allocation by calculating the free memory compared to the allocation request being made. And setting it to 1 enables the wizardry mode, where kernel always advertises that it has enough free memory for any allocation. Setting to 2, means that processes can only allocate up to a configurable amount (overcommit_ratio) of RAM and will start getting allocation failure or OOM messages when it goes beyond that amount.



Is it safe to do so, no. I haven't seen any proper use case where disabling memory overcommit actually helped, unless you are 100% certain of the workload and hardware capacity. In case you are interested, install kernel-docs package and go to /Documentation/sysctl/vm.txt to read more, or read it online.



If you set vm.overcommit_memory=2 then it will overcommit up to the percentage of physical RAM configured in vm.overcommit_ratio (default is 50%).



echo 0/1/2 > /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory 



This will not survive a reboot. For persistence, put this in /etc/sysctl.conf file:



vm.overcommit_memory=X


and run sysctl -p. No need to reboot.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able